Re: Stewart Swerdlow's "Illuminati News"
Yeah, it's funny, all this technology, all the information out there but no one can find out the truth about anything. I say, take in what you need and leave the rest. What difference does it make if he never was at Montauk. But it is interesting that he doesn't rub elbows w/others that profess to have been there and stays w/the safe premise that he doesn't tell his opinions of any other person's work, rarely states his sources for any of his "news".
But, just like the new threads about being fed up w/Whistleblowers, once you've gleaned & accepted that you've played the victim (which opens up avenues for predators to work you), taken responsibility & your power back, what use is there for any of these people.
He does admit that he doesn't believe that it's possible to deprogram in one lifetime, however Janet does. IF it's true that he was programmed at the level that he professes, I can't see him EVER deprogramming because the maze is too well placed.
Personally? I don't give him any more of my money. I've also had negative experiences that I will not elaborate about. And I've also heard about other people's experiences. AND. get this: there are alot of his "followers" who are actually afraid of him, that he has ability to "see" you and affect your life, BUT they continue to follow him, go figure.
|