Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - New Interview Henry Deacon or Arthur Newman

TraineeHuman · 08-22-2009, 05:05 AM

It seems to me that probably every PC whistleblower who's worked for the government or had access to secret facilities has obviously had and even is having brainwashing and Psy Ops work done on them -- maybe something slipped into their coffee now and then, and so on. Maybe they're at times even unconsciously destructive or misleading or dishonest as a result. But let's not forget, folks, that Dan Burisch/Crain and Henry/Arthur have been two of PC's top star witnesses. They do deserve a lot of respect, if only for the major courage they have shown. It seems to me nearly all of these whistleblowers are quite sincere -- though they're all human and have egos as well, and are under huge pressure too.

The Neumann (also known as von Neumann) surname (German, Austrian and Hungarian) has been one of the most distinguished in the world of mathematics for the last century plus. John von Neumann is particularly famous because he basically invented the first computer. Well, he handled all the theoretical design and invention and conception issues and an engineer worked with him to find a way to wire circuits etc together in a way that would fit his concept. So if the surname was made up, that would have been done at least two centuries ago, folks. Meanwhile, there's no constructive point in dishonoring such a distinguished surname. I'll bet "they" only send the very best and brightest to Mars (well, maybe "Aryan" blood or whatever is required too).

Along the same lines, Greer may well have been unknowingly brainwashed in certain ways. He's also no doubt learnt to be something of a diplomat, at least in terms of doing deals at some levels. He's probably had to, after attempts on his life and successful attempts on somebody who was his closest friend. That doesn't necessarily mean that 90% or 95% or 99% of what he says isn't totally true. I certainly find him one of the most informative of insiders. I'm not saying I trust everything he says, but I do always find listening to him quite inspiring, and informative as well. Respect doesn't cost anything.

08-22-2009, 05:05 AM	#12
TraineeHuman Avalon Senior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 174	Re: New Interview Henry Deacon or Arthur Newman It seems to me that probably every PC whistleblower who's worked for the government or had access to secret facilities has obviously had and even is having brainwashing and Psy Ops work done on them -- maybe something slipped into their coffee now and then, and so on. Maybe they're at times even unconsciously destructive or misleading or dishonest as a result. But let's not forget, folks, that Dan Burisch/Crain and Henry/Arthur have been two of PC's top star witnesses. They do deserve a lot of respect, if only for the major courage they have shown. It seems to me nearly all of these whistleblowers are quite sincere -- though they're all human and have egos as well, and are under huge pressure too. The Neumann (also known as von Neumann) surname (German, Austrian and Hungarian) has been one of the most distinguished in the world of mathematics for the last century plus. John von Neumann is particularly famous because he basically invented the first computer. Well, he handled all the theoretical design and invention and conception issues and an engineer worked with him to find a way to wire circuits etc together in a way that would fit his concept. So if the surname was made up, that would have been done at least two centuries ago, folks. Meanwhile, there's no constructive point in dishonoring such a distinguished surname. I'll bet "they" only send the very best and brightest to Mars (well, maybe "Aryan" blood or whatever is required too). Along the same lines, Greer may well have been unknowingly brainwashed in certain ways. He's also no doubt learnt to be something of a diplomat, at least in terms of doing deals at some levels. He's probably had to, after attempts on his life and successful attempts on somebody who was his closest friend. That doesn't necessarily mean that 90% or 95% or 99% of what he says isn't totally true. I certainly find him one of the most informative of insiders. I'm not saying I trust everything he says, but I do always find listening to him quite inspiring, and informative as well. Respect doesn't cost anything.