Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitewolf
Very true pilot. I think the explanation given (the "sane" one at least) about why the cars on the street next to the twin towers were blown up or on fire prior to the collapses was due to the blasts that resulted from the explosions that were placed in the base of the buildings which many witnesses have attested to. Of course these witnesses have been silenced by the corporate media.
|
Right, that still doesn't explain the cars on the FDR that were damaged in the same manner. Explosions at the base of the towers could not possibly have affected that area-it's just too far away. The only thing I could come up with to explain those cars on the highway is that they were towed there at some point, but when and by whom? The damage itself is very strange. Honestly I had never seen the photos of cars on the bridges and the FDR so now I'm intrigued by the possibility but it doesn't matter-if you or I or anyone else comes to a conclusion about what happened and how it all went down, what's the diff? There are so many people out there who still buy the official swill, the media who could possibly give them a little hint is not covering the truth movement except to ridicule it, and short of some whistleblower who gets some serious consideration by the media, most people will think you are as nutty as you think this Dr Judy is. What a brilliant plan it was. They fixed so no matter how reasonable you are, you are still an unpatriotic and dangerous nut. I'm not talking about republican fox zombies only, thoughtful and progressive lefty types still won't look at the evidence objectively because it's too fringe.