I would like to say that I've been following the latest developments on this issue. 
There is so much material published that I can't keep up with everything, but I do my best.
For those who want to know, I suggest this radio interview:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Drew-Ma...embed=download
Since the start, for me, this is all about an opportunity to wake people up. The sheeple don't wanna hear about conspiracies, they just want to obey the law. 
The Jane Burgermeister news gave me the link I needed between conspiracies and the law. Because of that news, David Rockefeller and David Rothschild are no longer the inoffensive and passive rich guys they managed to look like. 
To the sheeple, that link wakes their mind to the real possibility of a power structure that if proved to be true (and I do my best to prove it to them), would shift the authority of the laws they obey to figures they don't respect.
And that's the key:
http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/05/1...17beattyt.html
	Quote:
	
	
		| Chernow goes on to tell the story of Standard Oil's progress through ''cooperation'' into a monopoly that was finally broken up by a Supreme Court decision in 1911; of Rockefeller's second career in philanthropy; and of his contempt for the rights of labor, which led to the infamous ''Ludlow Massacre'' of 1914, when Colorado militiamen set fire to the tents of striking miners, killing two women and 11 children. (Rockefeller hated unions because their power to withhold labor demanded the respect due equals, leaving no room for the self-flattering moral noblesse he exercised in his philanthropy.) In old age, Chernow tells us, Rockefeller the rapacious billionaire was reincarnated with the help of the new field of public relations as Rockefeller the lovable old codger. | 
	
 Governments are PR spokesmen for monopolists that can't be liked by the public. So much that these monopolists have to use the medias to make sure the public don't even hear about them at all. Well not anymore!
What happened after the news broke out is not serving the cause at all. The message has been delivered since day one. If the messenger can't prove nothing more than to have carried that message... (I let you figure the rest of my thought)
Now let's go back to showing people how ugly their masters are without their PR teams!