Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Boy
My biggest fault with her is her style and she does not plan on changing it may very well be the part that causes whistleblowers to look for some one else to get their message out . She jumps all over the place interrupting and taking the person to other things that they could get to later with out ever letting her finish what they were originally talking about
You could equate it to starting to read a book at page one then jumping to the end then the middle and then back to the start . It doesn`t work there is no flow to it . It makes her look like she is totally unprepared or lost . There is no format followed and anyone could do it that way from off the street with no education or experience all they would have to do is go online and research the person they wanted to interview and bang give them a camera
|
I admit it, I've been aggravated by every thought you enumerate. I've found the interrupting absolutely maddening. Yes, the jumping around, oh my! And man, that girl needs to get a list of questions and guide the guest through in a logical order. What is this chaos? And then I've experienced certain "change points".
A big change point for me was (I think at Vilcabamba) when Bill said, speaking from experience, something to the effect of, you don't put a leash on Kerry. My irritation while listening to "interviews" or "conversations" from then on decreased by about 50%. How many times in my life have I let someone "put a leash" on me? Gotta admit those were some real low points.
What am trying to say? What have I learned in 57 earth years? Don't stay stuck ... move on ... when you (anyone) come to this moot point, vector a change in your attitude or stay stuck in irritation. It's a choice.