Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post

Lightpotential · 08-11-2009, 08:40 PM

Dear Group,

My view of the Dr. Greer interview is that overall it was indeed a bad interview. It has to be said that in the time leading up to the interview Kerry had posted some very negative remarks of Dr. Greer i.e. the “dangerous and insidious” comments on the Project Camelot home page. The other point is that it became clear – forcefully so as the interview progressed – that Kerry and Bill seemed intent upon ‘nailing’ Greer upon the issue of his expressed view that there were no ‘bad aliens’.

I think basically, it all boils down to the fact that Greer has a somewhat different perspective than Kerry and Bill, and that this is down to the type of witnesses that they have each interviewed and the contacts that they have made over the years. I would thus say that Greer’s view that there are no ‘bad aliens’ is a very carefully constructed THEORY based upon the evidence as he sees it. But that Kerry and Bill both, to my mind, hold to the view of the existence of ‘bad aliens’ due to their personal BELIEF in the truth of the testimony of certain of their most prominent witnesses. And here I would offer up the names of Henry Deacon and Dan Burisch.

08-11-2009, 08:40 PM	#171
Lightpotential Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: England Posts: 64	Re: Steven Greer Interview Discussion Dear Group, My view of the Dr. Greer interview is that overall it was indeed a bad interview. It has to be said that in the time leading up to the interview Kerry had posted some very negative remarks of Dr. Greer i.e. the “dangerous and insidious” comments on the Project Camelot home page. The other point is that it became clear – forcefully so as the interview progressed – that Kerry and Bill seemed intent upon ‘nailing’ Greer upon the issue of his expressed view that there were no ‘bad aliens’. I think basically, it all boils down to the fact that Greer has a somewhat different perspective than Kerry and Bill, and that this is down to the type of witnesses that they have each interviewed and the contacts that they have made over the years. I would thus say that Greer’s view that there are no ‘bad aliens’ is a very carefully constructed THEORY based upon the evidence as he sees it. But that Kerry and Bill both, to my mind, hold to the view of the existence of ‘bad aliens’ due to their personal BELIEF in the truth of the testimony of certain of their most prominent witnesses. And here I would offer up the names of Henry Deacon and Dan Burisch.