Quote:
Originally Posted by tone3jaguar
He probably did this because he was aware that there was not a vetting process for Camelot Witnesses like there is for Disclosure Project Witnesses. If there is no proof that a person is who they say they are then the chances of disinformation are much greater. I am not saying that this was the case on all Camelot interviewees. Actually most of the Camelot interviews where provable legitimate people. But you know what they say, a few bad apples.....
|
Or, he's disinfo.
Or, he's working with a group of them to push forward their agenda, and he's in denial.