[Practitioner]

In a lengthy interview, through which there was an opportunity for dedicated researchers to compare and corroborate certain facts, very little evidence of material importance was shared. As scientists and investigators, both Greer and Camelot should be willing lay evidence on the table and have a rational discussion in support their respective views. Instead, we were treated to a largely vague argument and conflict of personal reputation. To that end, the interview could have been better organized. Perhaps it was impromptu.

Greer admitted early in the interview that there are several factors that have restricted disclosure, including geo-political and economic (referring to the consolidated power of those who call themselves majestic). At the same time, I think that both Greer and Camelot realize that the current situation is dynamically changing--the consciousness of people on earth (and perhaps elsewhere) is changing; the environment is changing (perhaps on a cosmic scale)--and likely this makes it difficult for either side offer definitive conclusions.

Have human beings' and other beings' bodies been cloned? Quite likely.

Have extra-terrestrials and/or inter-dimensionals interfered with humankind at a physical and psychological level? Apparently.

Have there existed both 'positive' and 'negative' agendas for power and control? It seems so.

Should people awaken themselves and comport themselves in a positive and vigilant manner? Not a bad idea.

In the end, I'm not sure that Camelot and Greer are really in disagreement. However, I sense that Greer feels restricted in terms of what he is at liberty to pronounce in a public forum.