If I had cancer I would go straight to San Diego to one of the top cancer experts in the world - Vincent Gammill - and tell him Karen referred you.
Center for the Study of Natural Oncology, Inc.
http://www.natural-oncology.org/about.htm
Recent Vincent post to cancercured - to subscribe send blank email to:
cancercured-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
"What I do is very individual. I have never seen two identical cancer
patients. There is no protocol as such. Over the years I have found
certain meds or strategies far more useful than others. I like
certain targeting vaccines, PARP inhibitors, synergists, oncolytic
viruses, and strategies to unmask tumors from immune surveillance. I
like ion trapping.
"I always start with determining intention, be it a distortive therapy
such as anything that produces extremes in the body's biochemistry in
an effort to find wedge issues, or if I can start immediately on
immune reclamation.
"There are always wide variations in cancer patients, not only the
type, grade, and metastasis, but of weight extremes, Karnofsky score,
chemo history, budget, proximity, counterproductive (or supportive)
input from others, intelligence/understanding of the strategies,
discipline, age, co-morbid conditions, etc.
"I am not a fan of any conventional or alternative strategy. Most are
quite mindless in their standard-of-care, one-size-fits-all
simplicity. Their popularity largely depends on marketing and/or
fantasy. The first part of our program is one of deprogramming, one
of critical thinking. Both the practitioner and the patient should
be epistemologists. This opens the door to true cooperation.
"Percentages of restoration of health depends on prescreening. It is
that simple. If the numbers of turn-arounds that I see go above,
say, 80% then I am taking too many easy cases. If it drops below
that then I am taking too many human train wrecks."