Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post

14 Chakras · 08-05-2009, 11:35 PM

Deciding who is 'good' and who is 'bad' is something I don't agree is the path to enlightenment.

We see through a glass darkly here. There is truth found everywhere, but illusions also found everywhere. The path is one of mastering our discernment, we are working towards Christ discernment which is where we can see and hear what is real and what is unreal.

When we expect a person either has only truth or only lies, then we are assuming things are very black and white, and that's not reality.

I'm certainly not here saying everything DB says is true, and it's not even so much about DB, but it is about whether or not it's a good approach to judge people and their work and put them in categories of good or bad. I don't agree with this. Personally, my discernment has led me to continue to believe that some of the info that DB revealed is ground breaking and very interesting.

In fairness, there are disinfo agents, and there are mind controlled disinfo agents, I believe that is true. It is also a good idea to share our discernment on individuals. I'm sharing my discernment in this case. It obviously differs from some others, and that's a good thing, because if you only get one viewpoint, then you're missing a big part of the spectrum of possibilities.

I don't think vaccines are a good thing. I also don't think because someone is a microbiologist they can go back to some lab and prove that they are harmful. Vaccines are so effective for the PTB because it is thus far almost impossible to conclusively prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are harmful. Feel free to take whatever study you can find to your local doctor or microbiologist or scientist and I'm guessing, if they bother to investigate, you will be presented with 5 studies for everyone that you show them that show that vaccines are safe.

I'm not saying those studies aren't skewed, but I am saying it's very difficult and possibly impossible to conclusively prove, at this point, that vaccines are harmful beyond any shadow of a doubt, even for a microbiologist.

At some stages on the search we may need to be very black and white about things, but I believe we must keep climbing from there where we can hear truth even when it comes from very unexpected sources. If the messenger is an ant, heed him.

Peace!

08-05-2009, 11:35 PM	#49
14 Chakras Avalon Senior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Calgary, Canada Posts: 832	Re: I am calling out Dan Burisch Deciding who is 'good' and who is 'bad' is something I don't agree is the path to enlightenment. We see through a glass darkly here. There is truth found everywhere, but illusions also found everywhere. The path is one of mastering our discernment, we are working towards Christ discernment which is where we can see and hear what is real and what is unreal. When we expect a person either has only truth or only lies, then we are assuming things are very black and white, and that's not reality. I'm certainly not here saying everything DB says is true, and it's not even so much about DB, but it is about whether or not it's a good approach to judge people and their work and put them in categories of good or bad. I don't agree with this. Personally, my discernment has led me to continue to believe that some of the info that DB revealed is ground breaking and very interesting. In fairness, there are disinfo agents, and there are mind controlled disinfo agents, I believe that is true. It is also a good idea to share our discernment on individuals. I'm sharing my discernment in this case. It obviously differs from some others, and that's a good thing, because if you only get one viewpoint, then you're missing a big part of the spectrum of possibilities. I don't think vaccines are a good thing. I also don't think because someone is a microbiologist they can go back to some lab and prove that they are harmful. Vaccines are so effective for the PTB because it is thus far almost impossible to conclusively prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are harmful. Feel free to take whatever study you can find to your local doctor or microbiologist or scientist and I'm guessing, if they bother to investigate, you will be presented with 5 studies for everyone that you show them that show that vaccines are safe. I'm not saying those studies aren't skewed, but I am saying it's very difficult and possibly impossible to conclusively prove, at this point, that vaccines are harmful beyond any shadow of a doubt, even for a microbiologist. At some stages on the search we may need to be very black and white about things, but I believe we must keep climbing from there where we can hear truth even when it comes from very unexpected sources. If the messenger is an ant, heed him. Peace! Last edited by 14 Chakras; 08-05-2009 at 11:43 PM.