Very interesting Steve.
Probably just my perverse sense of humour, but this conjures pictures in my mind of what a cartoon the whole "whistleblower" scene has become.
How long before we get to the K-tel whistleblower certified course, or Ron Popeel's Whistleblower in a box, with glow in the dark badge?
The manipulative controllers are expert at creating "source hidden" conflicts. I had the same notion about that newly surfaced Obama cert. I don't know or think anything about it's origin, but it would be a good example of masterful manipulation be the PTB, in the sense that if you had lots of resources and reach, how would you go about discrediting the birther movement? You'd create a false certificate (and could make it look authentic) promote it in such a way that the birthers would dive in and spread it virally, then you'd show how it was a fraud or hoax, and make the birthers look ridiculous.
Same deal with making the engineered flu/deadly vaccine/eugenics program whistleblower movement look tin foil capped.
9/11 truth is another.
Frankenfoods business is another.
Not saying that's what happened or that that is the case, but it would be a good example of the type of layered deception the real problem creaters would likely use.
The PTB use a sort of espionage or intelligence version of how Aikido functions as a martial art. In other words, why expend the energy of doing someone in, when they are already creating energy to subvert to cause them to do themselves in.
Icke talked about the mechanism of "Problem, Reaction, Solution". It's good to have an understanding of what a problem is. It's characterized by opposing forces, of comparable magnitude. It's any thing, and that things counter-thing. opposing wills, intentions, definitions, energies, plans, and really anything that can be seen as having the potential for opposing vectors.
It's inevitable that TPTB would take over anything like an upcoming "whistleblower movement". It's what they do. They co-opt. They infiltrate and subvert from within. They play both sides against the middle. They create discreditable evidence and put it in a persons path.
IMO, since the whole whistleblower phenomenon has become enough of an irritant that they have felt the need to scratch the itch, it's probably a good time to get out of the whistelblower business.
One thing seems pretty plain. You become what you resist. Do we really want to be spending so much energy and attention on resisting the PTB?
Can you think of any (or many) recent examples of Whistleblowers behaving like PTB?
It's hilariously ironic.
I keep going back to the old movie "War games", where the AI that has the world on the brink of destruction, is made to conclude that "the only way to win, is to not play".
I've come to a similar conclusion where the PTB are concerned. What you have to become in order to beat them at their own game, is too high a price to pay for the win. The ultimate joke would be taking them to court.
Problem, Reaction, Solution only works if you are able to have the mindset of "Problem" created for you. Since there is some evidence that each successive solution becomes the defacto next problem, it's perhaps time to simply refuse to have the PTB idiots dictate what we will have as problems.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_A
Hi Everybody,
It seems that the cake is getting too small to be shared. Bottom lines are being affected.
The Dr. Deagle / Jane Burgermeister thing can be explained at the following:
YouTube - JANE BURGERMEISTER TRUTH *Updated*
What's been happening, which becomes evident towards the end of the recording is that Dr. Ott has been warning of Swine Flu for ten years, Dr. Deagle for five years and then comes along a jumpstart and makes a splash, gets into center circle, receives the international spotlight and gets up everybodys' nose.
It seems that the speight of cross words between the "whistleblower" faction is quite possibly based on market share.
Okay, we could argue that it wasn't really ethical for the new kid on the block take over a subject which has been proudly been presented for some time by others. But that being said, if these people didn't take up space that their now competition had,nothing would have been said.
So we have the current situation between Beagle and Burgermeister, Burisch and Deacon - another newbie on the circuits - and Camelot possibly for bringing him on to the circuits.
Whilst everyone is trying to get more exposure, extra pieces are and can only be a hinderance. The quality global market is a finite entity, slicing the cake even thinner leaves everybody with a little less.
Polemical comments? Sure.
Best regards,
Steve |