I'm going to raise the issue of trust here. Billy Meier's story is very interesting, but his history of believability is in question to me due to the wedding cake ufo pictures he said were real. I looked into his information a while back and want to share this with those interested.
I dig and search out a topic or subject of interest from as much of a non-judgmental position as possible. Then after I have immersed myself in someone's story and am often impressed, I force myself to look for holes or other evidence that puts holes in their story.
Now, just because someone lies in part does not mean they are a complete liar, so I try to pull out what is possible truth from the lies. All good disinfo people put some truth with their lies. I am not calling Mr. Meier a complete liar, but I do believe he made up the wedding cake photos himself due to the following images:

saucer in front of Mr. Meier's house
Note the notch on the front right area, that will be important.
This next photo is of a trashcan lid on Mr. Meier's farm:
I found the last two pics at
http://forgetomori.com/2007/ufos/the...x-photographs/ and believe it has some interesting information to share.
Mr. Meier's ex-wife says he made it up and is followed like a cult leader. Watch this You Tube Video for further proof he is not to be trusted:
Now, does this mean Mr. Meier is not in touch with E.T.s? No, but it does make me stop to ponder what he has to say. I do not believe his wedding cake photos, and therefore it makes his entire story suspect. If Kerry were to find some person to interview and claimed they were to be some deep insider white hat that she had just met after said individual contacted Bill or Kerry, and it was later found out that it was her third cousin from San Jose California who is a regular Joe or Joan then Kerry would be finished in this movement. Would it negate all of her work or ability to expose truth? No, but it would probably negate her ability to share it as few would be willing to trust what she had to say. So, am I the only one who finds the images shared as very good reason to doubt Mr. Meier?