Update from Jane burgermeister
Role of the Austrian media in the Baxter cover-up
July 8, 2009 by birdflu666
I’m getting ready to file a new set of criminal charges here in Austria over Baxter, WHO and their role in producing and distributing 72 kilos of live bird flu pandemic material this February.
Because I’m arguing an international corporate crime syndicate is at work, I’ve spent some time analysing the system — “the monolithic and ruthless conspiracy as JF Kennedy called it — to determine just how this group accomplishes its aims and operates, at least in Austria.
The pattern of activities in Austria seems to be repeating itself in other countries, and so it might be interesting if I tell you a little bit about what I have found out so you can see whether the same applies to your country.
So far, I’ve isolated the Austrian Health Minister Alois Stöger, health ministry officials such as the Director General of Public Health Hubert Hrabcik and the Chief Vetinary Officer and a host of other people, also related to the pharmaceutical and medical industry, as key players who are working together with Baxter and WHO in a synchornised and coordinated way to help them accomplish their goals and also cover up their tracks.
Other key players I have identified here are the press barons.
Austria is a pretty small country with only about 8 million people and so I’ve had the chance to accumulate concrete proof of how the mainstream media in Austria, in this specific case, Profil, a magazine that markets itself as critical and independent, is deliberately and systematically concealing from the general public the true nature of what happened at Baxter, in part because of email communications I had directly with Profil over the Baxter episode in April.
Although the mainstream media suggests to people there is a strict division between a government, corporations, society and the media, my own experience working as a journalist has taught me that the media, like most governments, are actually in the hands of an international criminal corporate group, who control the flow of information to the general public in such a way as to further their business interests.
Planning and preparation alone cannot guaranteee success in any attempt to use an artificial virus and a toxic injection to carry out large-scale murder.
If enough people knew the virus came from a lab and that companies like Baxter, which are contracted by government to supply the vaccine, are also releasing that same virus and deliberately, they would refuse the injection!
People will only be led to accept the vaccine of their own free will if there is feasible explanation for this virus (originates in a mysterious way from pigs, birds etc etc ), if the threat is hyped up, and if the vaccine is presented as a cure rather than as a killer.
Only if a consistently feasibly explanation is put out by the media in North America and also Europe can a crime of this kind be carried out: and many people rely on the mainstream media to provide them with information.
Profil’s report on the Baxter incident this April shows just how that same media is being instrumentalised by members of the international crime syndicate to systematically mislead people to enable this crime to occur, and underlines that the media has become an integral part of the international corporate crime syndicate.
A report appeared on Baxter in the print edition of Profil on April 20th 2009 in a section called “Extra”, that is, two weeks after Profil received my 70 pages of criminal charges and after I rang the magazine twice asking them to cover the incident.
The title of the Profil report on pages 62-64 was “Safe is almost safe.”
The reporter: Emil Bobi.
In the final few paragraphs of the report, which comes across as a kind of eulogy to the high standards of the pharmaceutical industry and includes a picture of focussed lab staff in spotless protective clothing working at benches, Bobi finally gets round to mentioning the Baxter incident.
Bobi calls it a “banal” lab accident.
He informs the reader that the contamination of 72 kilos of flu vaccine material with live bird flu virus occurred because a tube that was connected to a bag containing glucose (sugar water) had not been switched after “work had been done on the bird flu virus“.
The tube cost barely one euro, he tells us in the third paragraph from the end, but the staff had not bothered to change the tube because the “liquid was not meant for people anyway”, according to “a source that was close to the events”.
Furthermore, he implies that this incident breaches no regulations because the regulations for manufacturing medicines do not apply in this case as it was experimental material.
What Bobi, however, forgets to mention is that the biosecurity level 3 rules do apply to highly dangerous live bird flu virus “experiments”, according to EU Directive 90/679.
He also omits to mention that 36 people had to undergo preventative treatment for bird flu in hospital in Austria and the Czech Republic and also be put under qurantine because they had contact with this very same Baxter material.
Biosafety level 3 regulations require that the live bird flu virus be kept in a separate room with negative pressure, double doors etc. Any accidental contamination is therefore impossible, let alone the manufacturing of 72 kilos of material.
Bobi’s report does not explain why the bird flu virus was in Baxter’s lab in Orth an der Donau the first place; why it was sent out of the biosecurity facilities irradiated and also with a false label; why it was destined for vaccine material; what was the specific strain of H5N1 involved; and whether it was the particularly lethal strain patented by Baxter.
True, I didn’t find out myself Baxter had sent out the gigantic amount of 72 kilos until the Health Minister Alois Stöger was forced to reveal the fact when he answered parliamentary questions on the incident on the last day of the 8 week period allowed to him on May 20th.
All the same, the report struck me as odd. As a minimum, Bobi could have done some research and found out that biosafety level 3 regulations applied even if he hadn’t had time to read my criminal charges, which also contained that information.
I sent Bobi an email and he replied on April 23 2009 at 17:44:59 from his email address
bobi.emil@profil.at
My questions were:
1) “Where do you get your information? You write “according to sources”? What sources?”
2) “Are the so-called Extra pages paid for by industry? Why are they called Extra? Did the pharmaceutical industry give money or another form of support for this report?”
Bobi replied:
1) “”sources” means in this case a source that cannot be named which was followed the reconstruction of the accident at first hand”
2) “rest assued: my report is an editorial one and is not “supported” by anyone or evenfinanced”
The founder and publisher of Profil, like the Standard and trend in Austria, is Oscar Bronner, who attends the Bilderberg meetings regularly.
This year the Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann was at the Bilderberg meeting in Athens along with the CEO of Novartis, the company that killed at least 21 people in Poland last summer during its fully licenced “bird flu” drug trials.
It seems to me this report by Profil is a pretty clear example of how a magazine is deliberately masking the truth about an event so serious that it nearly triggered a pandemic around the world, according to the Times of India.
The language, ideas and images in the Profil report are used to deceive the public into thinking it was completely harmless.
This report is, however, typical of the mainstream Austrian media’s coverage of the Baxter incident with few exceptions. I was told one journalist who finally covered the Baxter contamination in a mainstream newspaper did so inspite of his editor.
Though I’ve reported for the British Medical Journal on many a more trivial thing, their editor turned down a report on the Baxter incident when I sent the information to them.
Interestingly enough, control of the media is also a central objective in Austria’s pandemic influenza plan. Guidelines and directives are to be issued to the media on how to cover the “pandemic.”
The pandemic plan foresees “panic” and argues that a strict communication policy, including pre-written press releases with the information from WHO and the EU, need to be implemented at every level.
This looks like a WHO propaganda misinformation apparatus designed to reinforce the idea that the injections from Baxter are necessary and good — even when people die following those very injections. The deaths will be used to whip up more fear and encourage people to get their injections more quickly.
Under the pandemic plan, a system will be set up to gather information about how many people have been vaccinated in order to more efficiently increase the vaccination rate.
The objective of the Austrian pandemic plan is to inject everyone with a toxic brew of heavy metals, whole viruses and adjuvants – and that for a virus that Baxter and WHO helped create and release in the first place.
All the security and health and communication functions in Austria will be under the power of WHO and the EU in the event of a pandemic.
Government departments at federal and local level will be required to subordinate their activities to WHO – and so will the media.
The mainstream media will move from being a covert to an overt arm of the internaitonal corporate crime syndicate.
I’ve just scanned in a copy of the report and cover of Profil of April 20th. By coincidence, this same edition reports that many Austrian journalists worked for the CIA in the sixties.
I urge all journalists to start reporting the truth about the H1N1 flu, namely, that it is a lab virus, and the truth about Baxter and its 72 kilos of contaminated material.
President John F. Kennedy gave a speech on April 27, 1961 before the American Newspaper Publishers Association in which he stressed the responsibility of the press for allowing the crimes of this internaitonal corporate syndicate to occur.
“The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.”
“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”
“No President should fear public scrutinity of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.
I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers– I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: “An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it.” We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.
Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed– and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First (emphasized) Amendment– the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution– not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and sentimental, not to simply “give the public what it wants”–but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.
This means greater coverage and analysis of international news– for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security…”
http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/
viking