This was written and saved to notepad BEFORE Bill posted on Camelot that this forum was down
POWWEB
This site has been suspended
If you manage this site and have a question about why the site is not available, please contact us directly.
Also get.......................
http://projectavalon.net/forum/index.php
You are not authorized to view this page
You might not have permission to view this directory or page using the credentials you supplied.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you believe you should be able to view this directory or page, please try to contact the Web site by using any e-mail address or phone number that may be listed on the projectavalon.net home page.
You can click Search to look for information on the Internet.
HTTP Error 403 - Forbidden
Internet Explorer
-----------------------------------------
AND.........................
Just an observation, please do not take this personally or too deeply. Over recent few years more and more
US based whistleblowrrs have stepped up to the plate with varying data, mostly scientific based as most have a doctorate of some kind. Some compliment each others data and tend to confirm one anothers data. No problem with that at face value. One could be extremely skeptical and ask the following...................
1: Why so many recent US whistleblowers?
2: Why so many with scientific backgrounds?
3: Why does the data stated by each, at times contradicts then compliments others data?
4: As its a media and public alike tendancy to accept more easily data/testimony emanating from someone with a scientific background rather than from someone not within these parameters, would it not be the perfect tool to 'educate', 'manipulate', spread disinformation?
I am NOT stating this is the case, merely wish to highlight something most enquiring minds should at least have had cross their minds at some stage.
Its also very interesting that many of these whistleblowers have their interviews recorded and placed here available to everyone, but then in most cases its done and dusted, no after feedback or questioning from those whom may wish to question/dissect/verify to their own satisfaction, their respective testimony.
With one or two short lasting exceptions, very short in one instance, whilst another threw his toys out of the pram, have such whistleblowers hung around daily under the scrutiny of members here. Facing your questioners on a real time basis has been non existant here with one exception, yours truly. I think this is a unique situation as others seem not to be able to dare face those whom would like to deeply question their claims and not simply rely on the required acceptance expected of them from a recorded interview.
As stated above this is just an observation but a valid one maybe voiced silently by others whom wish not to rock the boat.
Call me a heretic, call me a turncoat, whatever, I do not care, I have 15 years disclosure under my belt and have stood the test of time. Will these others be around in 15 years time?
I at least face my public my critics, I have the guts the spine and the balls to prove it. Do any of the others?
(This was written on Thursday before I knew Avalon was down, did not get a chance to listen to Radio and still have not had opportunity)
Barry