Re: John Lear
My thinking is that there is no legitimate claim any longer in "I need proof."
Proof is, as stated here and as Alan Watts has referred to things as being, "wiggly." Is it the concept of "cognitive dissonance" which has anyone, at this stage of available information, claiming a need for proof? (Show me weather balloons and I am happy to disagree again. It is safe and comfortable.)
A "need for proof" is now a mask for lethargic research or purposeful disinformation. I need no proof that all these things exist.
The depth of the connection is what is "wiggly."
I, as many others, absorb this obvious "lie on every level," to clearly see there is truth in assessing why there are "lies on every level."
|