[Myplanet2]

Hi Malletzky.

I wasn't criticizing this man, and he does have my full respect. I was simply answering this request (PLEASE WATCH THIS AND LET ME KNOW WHAT YOU THINK) made in the opening post of this thread. My vote was that this is worth looking into more.

My purpose in posting was simply to alert other readers who may yet have larger pieces of the puzzle obscured from view, that it might be a good idea to engage their discernment filters and examine Georges talk from the standpoint of what resonates as true for them.

Krishnamurti was famous for saying "the description is not the thing". Truth is personal. It is inside of us. It's ok to share our truth, but only as that. Our truth. Never as "THE" truth. And I'm not saying that is what George is doing either. Just making the point that truth is inside us, and it's a personal thing.

It is inevitable when you attempt to describe a truth, that you enter a lie into the equation. Because the description is not the thing. If a person could take another to that magical place and show them what they experienced or saw, the new viewer would certainly not come away with the same truth as the original viewer. Its just the nature of our created reality that it works this way.

So the personal policy I suggest for others, is the well known one of "Use personal discernment always, and take what resonates, while leaving the rest.

In Georges case, I found his analogies and relating his experiences to certain religious teachings and other mythologies to be a distraction from the truth he was imparting. That was not useful to me, personally, But to others that may have been just the thing that resonated, and plunked a piece of the puzzle in place.

That's the risk when you enter into comparison. As soon as you say "it's like......" you run the risk of hitting or missing with your audience, depending on the vibration they are resonating at. "it" is never "like". It only is. And you can only discover what is, through personal observation and experience. Never by considering the observations and experiences of another. The best that can be hoped for, is that the observations and experiences described by another will point into a place you are able to look into, and hopefully experience for yourself, and then it will be meaningful.

Otherwise, it just comes down to one personal accepting another persons mental construct, which is like the difference between watching a movie, and living the movie personally.

Placing too much importance on what another (any other) person says kind of negates our own creativity as well. I believe he said earth was supposed to turn into a sun? that's not happening. That doesn't work for me. My earth is going to thin and become less dense and solid, as it raises it's vibration to provide us a new playing field for the next chapter of our existence. This is MyPlanet2. And it's yours. And it's everyone elses too. We decide what is going to happen. All of us. No. Earth is not lighting up. At least not from the 3 D density it is now.

Hope this clarifies my comments a bit.