View Single Post
Old 06-02-2009, 04:12 PM   #54
judykott
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 711
Default Re: Air France airbus goes down

http://urbansurvival.com/week.htm
Bot Project: The Word "Weird" Comes to Mind

While we await the return of the predictive linguistics reports on June 21st (or around in there) I can't tell you how many readers have written asking if the missing plane/disappearance of the Air France flight over the Atlantic with 228 people on board meets or met the prediction in the ALTA (Asymmetric Language Trend Analysis) reports out of www.halfpasthuman.com around the concept of missing/vanishing celebrities which was expected over the course of summer.



The answer is complicated, so bear with me:



First point to make is that the whole "disappearances" meme (*a thought virus or propagating idea in the MSM) was explained in ALTA 1309 this way:

"The data sets continue to grow for [disappearances], with an increasing frequency of [reporting] of such over Summer from mid May onward. A number of the [disappearances], are also indicated to be [occurring] in Summer."

Apparently, the 'disappears' meme is going to be persistent for the next few months, since in ALTA 1109 (February 7 ALTA Report) it was described this way:

"In other words, the events of Spring/Summer of 2009 relative to the [disappearances] meme will repeat in a manifestation of a larger, related meme in late Fall and early Winter of 2009."

Since January (ALTA 1109 - Part 4) - January 31, 2009) there's been an expectation that (in general) we'd see all kinds of 'disappearing' being done this year, with perhaps the odd suicide (yup) and then this description of what would have been a perfect fit:

"There are still accruing values in support of at least 1/one instance of a [very rich person] going [missing] with their entire [crew of bodyguards/entourage]. This incident is not indicated until later in the year, perhaps mid [summer], and will follow a series of [disappearances] which will prompt the [increased visibility of groups of bodyguards] around these [key minions] and TPTB members. Several of these incidents of [disappearances] are forecast to involve [yachts] of some size, and in an early report, a case of the [disappearance] of the people, leaving behind the [boat] will be brought forward."

All of which gets us to a curious point about linguistics: You may remember that the predictive linguistics were previously a bit off prior to the space shuttle disaster. In that particular case, the linguistics had made references to a 'maritime disaster' and 'gem of the ocean'. As history unfolded, we learned that the 'gem of the ocean' linguistic was an archetypical reference to the "Columbia" and further, that the 'maritime disaster' was a 'space ship.'



Time monks are, of course aware of - and working on such issues. The news event that would have fit much more closely than the Air France event would have been a 'Hollywood' or 'rich Middle East' yacht going 'Mary Celeste'. In other words, being found at sea with no one aboard.



Still, something like the discovery of the Air France jet and 50 people/bodies would give us some 'fill' on the expectations, but that would leave a lot more to come as the year goes on. And higher profile people and the entourages.



You can see how the linguistics can make air (or space) and ocean mistake -- especially when you're looking at a future event 6-months in advance - when you see headline like this one in the Washington post this morning. "Airliner Leaves Mystery in its Wake."



Notice how "wake" is used? It's got one definition that is equivalent to the term 'aftermath'. But in a nautical sense a 'wake' is the waves left behind a boat. Air ships and space ships and archetype imagery that describes waves/sinking is right next door in the lexicon to turbulence/crashing; such is the stock and trade of being a time monk.



No worries, though. What we're doing is not an accepted piece of academia - we're so far out on the bleeding edge of computational linguistics it's not even funny. Besides, if your healthy skepticism makes you deny that large groups of communicating humans presage the future /leaks the future in their conversations, then fine - we understand the defense mechanism and how denial works. Just keep taking them blue pills. We're hooked on these red ones.



(*This is all copyright stuff reproduced here with exclusive permission and any reposting of this requires a link to the www.halfpasthuman.com site and this page as well...thank you for playing nicely.)



We oughta get more sense of this around the June 21 start of the $10-weekly sales of individual reports which yeah, I can't hardly wait for either.

---
judykott is offline   Reply With Quote