Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post

THEWATCHER · 05-31-2009, 01:03 AM

NOTES FYI

Preston Nichols claims he knows and has met Whitemore (Sentinel, head of AL/499 at the time of The Watchers placement in the facility). Preston states Whitemore was overseeing program operations on both sides of the Atlantic.Personal data and a description of Whitemore was never released publicly, The Watcher kept this data out of the public domain with the hope that future research would come to light.Preston has knowledge of the facilities and programs in use.Preston states the similarity between the Montauk chair and the trip seat should now become clear. With some research..........The London chair.
Preston confirms NSA being integral to operations and program controls.
Preston confirms codes used inside the Mannequin program as stated by The Watcher.

On a connected, but side note. we find it strange that, in the case of Dulce and security guard Thomas Castello, that with security being so very stringent at such facilities, that Castello managed to take in a camera or two and roam around taking stills and a surveillence videotape film. Then exiting the facility with camera and tape..There is something very wrong here. Security at such facilities, Peasemore included, would make it totally impossible for this to occur.The ONLY possible explanation if we are to believe the very short silent film segment is indeed from the interior of the Dulce facility, would be that the film removal was allowed and sanctioned by the controllers of Dulce, for whatever reason, whatever agenda.Same for the alleged 25 B/W photographs taken by Castello, of which, has anyone actually seen these? Not the alleged sketches which have appeared on the internet but the photo's themselves.
The gaping holes in the Dulce claim need addressing. Simply because other individuals lay claim to having involvement with Dulce should not steer one towards accepting the claims. Its called perpetuating the myth in certain circles. Others have made lavish, extraordinary almost unbelievable claims about Dulce with no substantiation or verification at all. The repeating of original claims by others over a period of time seems to have cemented the facility into the halls of acceptance by the research community.
The Dulce business might well be true, all we are pointing out is the fact that with such severe security it would have been impossible to obtain photographic data and remove secure documentation without inside help.

05-31-2009, 01:03 AM	#1318
THEWATCHER Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: UK Posts: 1,234	Re: Questions for THEWATCHER NOTES FYI Preston Nichols claims he knows and has met Whitemore (Sentinel, head of AL/499 at the time of The Watchers placement in the facility). Preston states Whitemore was overseeing program operations on both sides of the Atlantic.Personal data and a description of Whitemore was never released publicly, The Watcher kept this data out of the public domain with the hope that future research would come to light.Preston has knowledge of the facilities and programs in use.Preston states the similarity between the Montauk chair and the trip seat should now become clear. With some research..........The London chair. Preston confirms NSA being integral to operations and program controls. Preston confirms codes used inside the Mannequin program as stated by The Watcher. On a connected, but side note. we find it strange that, in the case of Dulce and security guard Thomas Castello, that with security being so very stringent at such facilities, that Castello managed to take in a camera or two and roam around taking stills and a surveillence videotape film. Then exiting the facility with camera and tape..There is something very wrong here. Security at such facilities, Peasemore included, would make it totally impossible for this to occur.The ONLY possible explanation if we are to believe the very short silent film segment is indeed from the interior of the Dulce facility, would be that the film removal was allowed and sanctioned by the controllers of Dulce, for whatever reason, whatever agenda.Same for the alleged 25 B/W photographs taken by Castello, of which, has anyone actually seen these? Not the alleged sketches which have appeared on the internet but the photo's themselves. The gaping holes in the Dulce claim need addressing. Simply because other individuals lay claim to having involvement with Dulce should not steer one towards accepting the claims. Its called perpetuating the myth in certain circles. Others have made lavish, extraordinary almost unbelievable claims about Dulce with no substantiation or verification at all. The repeating of original claims by others over a period of time seems to have cemented the facility into the halls of acceptance by the research community. The Dulce business might well be true, all we are pointing out is the fact that with such severe security it would have been impossible to obtain photographic data and remove secure documentation without inside help.