Steve_G

This is quite a long post so apologies in advance. This is how I view things but I mean no disrespect to anyone here who views things differently.


That argument doesn't hold up I'm afraid- if that's what they wanted they wouldn't have spent the last several thousand years hiding in the shadows and attempting to destroy any evidence of their existence.

This argument also doesn't stand up. If you put out love and light it will return to you, but not necessarily from the same entity or person you direct it at. If that were true then no child would ever be abused by their parents. That isn't to say that light can't shield you and protect you because it can, but I don't think you can aim it and use it like an energy weapon.

The Ghandi argument is a persuasive one on the surface, but what actually changed? The British were forced out of America by the War of Independance, but the IRS still collects taxes on behalf of the UK. Things only changed on the surface and the reppies still control both through the same bloodlines. The same is true in South Africa when apartheid was ended through a combination of worldwide protests against it and a lot of bloodshed internally, but the end result was that little changed- the families that ran the place then still run the place now, it just looks more like the illusion of democracy we have in the West. In India Ghandi and his followers forced the British to withdraw through non-violent means with considerably less bloodshed than the previous two, but the same bloodlines are still in power today.

In all three examples the surface changes solved nothing. There are still thousands upon thousands suffering in poverty in each, the gap between rich and poor is just the same as it always was (if not worse), technology that would solve all these problems is still supressed and the truth about who is really in power is still hidden. From the reptilian point of view they would much rather have buckets of blood during any surface changes but as long as they aren't directly threatened and its business as usual afterwards they aren't going to worry about it too much.

None of it was directed at the source of the problems, only at the outward illusions. Its like trying to mop up the water without fixing the leak first- no matter how hard we work or what method we use we'll still have wet feet.

They always have fall-back positions. These creatures aren't stupid, what they've done is nothing short of brilliant. When we see through the illusion of party politics they have the corporations to hide behind, then the banks. When we see through that they have the Illuminati vs NWO to fall back on.

It's the same in every area of our lives, but with one common denominator. America vs Russia. Christian vs Muslim. Socialism vs Capitalism. "Free" Nations vs Terrorists. New Age vs Mainstream Religion. Man vs Woman. Young vs Old. Individual vs State. In other words, Us vs Us. Human vs Human. So far anyway- there's always the possibility of a staged alien invasion to consider in their final push to terrify us into accepting a Nazi One World Government under their control, and probably scenarios none of us have even dreamed of yet.


When all the distractions have been overcome and we know they are there they have one final failsafe: to try to convince us that not fighting them is fighting them. They are obviously very good at this. I believed that for a while. But until we break through that last line of defence they still have us. We're still in the matrix, they're still in control. While we debate this we are still focused on each other and not on them. Us focused only on them is their worst nightmare because if it wasn't they wouldn't have expended so much energy attempting to prevent it.


To be clear, I'm not interested in retribution or evening the score. I don't hate them and I don't fear them. I just want them gone, and the only way to do that is to face up to the fact that they are here, they are in control, and that they are not unbeatable. This applies whether they are physical, higher dimensional or a combination. I want them gone because I love us enough to know that we deserve freedom and all the responsibilities that come with it, and not perpetual bondage from sadistic and cowardly oppressors who have kept us under their heel for millennia.

They view us as food, a commodity. That's the bottom line. They consider themselve utterly superior to us in every way and feel they have the right to do whatever they wish. If they want to torture and murder our children so what? They have that right. If they want us to live in perpetual misery and fear so what? They have that right. What we want doesn't enter into it. Do you empathise with a cheese sandwich when you eat it?

They won't go because we want them to. They won't stop eating us because we want them to. They won't suddenly become nicer because we send love and light to them. They will only go when we make it impossible for them to stay.

We could ask nicely first- why not? When we get to that stage they might even do it, because at that point we'll be looking directly at them and not at each other.

Do we stand there and tell them that we want them to leave us alone, but if they don't we won't do anything about it? Are we going to say "Oh well, we tried, I guess we'd better get back into our cages and let you carry on raping, torturing and murdering us. We'll allow you to continue to physically, mentally and spiritually abuse us. We'll permit you to keep us trapped in a perpetual cycle of reincarnation to be used again and again because we love you and it's just who you are."?

Or do we stand and tell them that one way or another they are leaving because we love and value ourselves enough to realise that we are worth much more than they will ever offer? That we are prepared to take any and all measures, even actions that we would much rather we didn't have to take, in order to free ourselves from their reign of horror? That we know our own value and our own power and we will not be slaves any more no matter how long it takes and whatever the price?

Let's put ourselves in their position. Which of those would we be more likely to take seriously?

I know which position I choose.

************************

Again, my apologies for the long post; I hope some of you made it through. Any and all responses are welcome.