View Single Post
Old 04-16-2009, 11:02 PM   #98
feeler
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 360
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_A View Post
Hi franciejones,

I'm afraid you're way off base on this one!

The 'Project Camelot' that St. Clair refers is in fact Project Camelot of the United States Army, started in 1964.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Camelot

I'm sure that in this case, a simple misquote could really put a spanner in the works as two other people on this thread who responded, openly thanked you for the information, which was not accurate.

Imagine the people who read the post and didn't reply thinking in the same way.

Let's do the necessary research people......

Best regards,

Steve
Steve, I thanked franciejones for her time and effort posting what St. Clair posted. How to interpret what St. Clair posted is up to us.

In the past I've wondered why Kerry and Bill picked the name that has been used, not in the best of light.

I listened to the 2 hour interview between St. Clair and Clif High, and perhaps missed the reference to Kerry/Bill.

All along I find the removal hypocritical and overreactive.

The term "handler" can mean the role of a campaign manager or a popular person's advisor, as stated in the dictionaries:

- handler - an agent who handles something or someone; "the senator's campaign handlers"

- a person employed to advise a politician, celebrity, etc. on what to say or do so as to shape public opinion and thereby develop a positive public image

On the other hand, I'm not sure what St. Clair is up to. I reserve my judgment.

What's going on? We are kept in the dark. I thought the truth is important to all in our spiritual journey.

Thanks Steve.

-feeler

Last edited by feeler; 04-17-2009 at 06:30 AM.
feeler is offline   Reply With Quote