Quote:
Originally Posted by Kari Lynn
Hi Kathleen
I will just quote the agent/Major that was using Barry's ID.
I know this person, have written to him. He is not Barry. But cared for the security of Barry's family and Barry himself while he lay in the hospital recouperating from almost being beaten to death by the NSA.
This is why Barry would hesitate posting any longer. Why should he subject himself to almost death, if no one believes him.
|
Hi Kari Lynn
I haven't been following this thread but I do know that there have been over 1,000 posts and 47,000 views of it. That can hardly be equated with no-one listening. Barry King also has his fair share of supporters on this thread so there
are people who believe him. However, if he was expecting everyone to believe him then it was inevitable he'd be disappointed.
Surely any whistleblower or witness has to accept that they are not going to be universally believed, and that they will be challenged on their story by some of those who hear it. They also need to accept that emotions can run high on subjects like this and that they may open themselves up to criticism if there are certain questions they cannot or will not answer.
For those hearing whistleblowers' stories it is essential that they critically evaluate them and ask whatever questions seem pertinent. Taking any of these stories at face value is pointless because of all the disinfo that has been and is still being spread around. I think it is also worth remembering that not all those who are spreading disinfo know that they are doing it- they genuinely believe what they are saying. As Richard Hoagland has said, "the lie is different on every level."
I don't know enough about Mr King and his testimony to have an opinion one way or the other. I'm simply stating what I consider universal principles in this subject area.