Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post

TtC · 02-25-2009, 09:07 PM

The Hopi and North American maps are relatively congruent. As for the World map, part of it is based off of Cayce's and Scallion's predictions. Scallion actually had a few geologist help with his maps. I agree with some of his stances, but not with others.

The map from Zetatalk I completely disregard because of the source. The information from there seems highly tainted even if it is true.

The thing about California falling into the sea has been played for at least the last fifty years, if not longer, and that is because of the San Andreas fault. That one is pretty mainstream.

As for the rest of it, I think most is based on what Cayce said in some of his readings. I know Europe has had some pretty bad flooding, but so has North America. The river in Prague overflowed and they marked on the walls of some buildings where the waterline was, in some places, three stories.

If you look at South America, the Amazon is a massive floodplain, so that is not too far fetched. The Galapagos are known to be sinking and so is Venice, that is common knowledge now.

Japan is not too stable in geological means, if I'm not mistaken. Islands go up and down all the time. And there is the debate about the saltwater line at the Sphinx.

As for the landmass in the Pacific, there have been mainstream reports from about 2000, that there was land rising, and that was from an oceanography or marine biology journal.

If you want to play the global warming card and all the ice has melted, there just went thirty meters increase of sea level worldwide.

There is information available that says there is a city underneath Lake Titicaca with boats and docks. The theory states that at one time it, too, was at sea level.

There are also accounts from the Tsunami in the Pacific that when the water originally receded from India or Ceylon, that the ruins of a city could be seen.

And the possibility there may be a crustal shift as well as a polar one.

All speculation, but let's see what happens. Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.

02-25-2009, 09:07 PM	#15
TtC Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 103	Re: A map of the world after earth changes The Hopi and North American maps are relatively congruent. As for the World map, part of it is based off of Cayce's and Scallion's predictions. Scallion actually had a few geologist help with his maps. I agree with some of his stances, but not with others. The map from Zetatalk I completely disregard because of the source. The information from there seems highly tainted even if it is true. The thing about California falling into the sea has been played for at least the last fifty years, if not longer, and that is because of the San Andreas fault. That one is pretty mainstream. As for the rest of it, I think most is based on what Cayce said in some of his readings. I know Europe has had some pretty bad flooding, but so has North America. The river in Prague overflowed and they marked on the walls of some buildings where the waterline was, in some places, three stories. If you look at South America, the Amazon is a massive floodplain, so that is not too far fetched. The Galapagos are known to be sinking and so is Venice, that is common knowledge now. Japan is not too stable in geological means, if I'm not mistaken. Islands go up and down all the time. And there is the debate about the saltwater line at the Sphinx. As for the landmass in the Pacific, there have been mainstream reports from about 2000, that there was land rising, and that was from an oceanography or marine biology journal. If you want to play the global warming card and all the ice has melted, there just went thirty meters increase of sea level worldwide. There is information available that says there is a city underneath Lake Titicaca with boats and docks. The theory states that at one time it, too, was at sea level. There are also accounts from the Tsunami in the Pacific that when the water originally receded from India or Ceylon, that the ruins of a city could be seen. And the possibility there may be a crustal shift as well as a polar one. All speculation, but let's see what happens. Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it. Last edited by TtC; 02-25-2009 at 09:10 PM.