Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - BIZARRE EVENTS

NorthernSanctuary · 02-22-2009, 07:17 PM

Information posted at Zetatalk seems to indicate that the satellites that supposed collided were far apart. Their explanation is that the PBT don't want us to know about the increase in fire balls; also want us to get use to the satellite colliding story when they start to fall from collisions with space debris.

"
Question: Can the Zeta's comment on the reported recent collision of US and Russian satellites. Per available information, their orbits appeared to be hundreds of kilometers apart. How could they have collided if the public is not being dubed?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_satellite_collision
Orbital Apopsis: 803 km
Orbital Periapsis: 778 km
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Orbital Periapsis: 522.0 km
Orbital Apopsis: 541.0 km

ZetaTalk Answer 2/14/2009: These satellites did not collide. Satellite orbits are very carefully managed, within and between countries sending them aloft. Why would it be otherwise? These are expensive machines, with much depending upon their operation. Even with the Russian satellite being inactive, no longer in use, as reported, these dead bodies are tracked by other means to ensure no collision with live satellites. A satellite may be out of control, but live satellites are in control and can be maneuvered to avoid those that are out of control.

Why would a lie be spread? We have mentioned that satellites will increasingly fail, and this has been happening but has been hidden from the public. The public is to have the perception that space junk has gotten so cluttered that these types of accidents can happen, because accidents with satellites will increasingly happen. This is spin control by the establishment. What occurred over Kentucky was just another fireball, but is being booked in the media as space junk, to add an exclamation point to the colliding satellite story.

Another fireball came to Earth on Sunday, February 15, 2009 and the FAA immediately promoted the space junk explanation.

VIDEO: Texas Fireball
http://disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/...s_FEB_16_2009/

Falling Debris over Texas 'Related to US-Russian Satellite Collision'
February 15, 2009
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...collision.html
Some of the callers around midmorning on Sunday reported what looked like a fireball in the sky. FAA spokesman Roland Herwig said officials suspect the debris could be related to the collision, but he said that had not been confirmed. The FAA notified pilots on Saturday to be aware of possible debris after a collision Tuesday between US and Russian communication satellites. The chief of Russia's Mission Control says clouds of debris from the collision will circle Earth and threaten numerous satellites.

But a day later, the FAA spokesperson retracted his statement.
"

02-22-2009, 07:17 PM	#39
NorthernSanctuary Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 698	Re: BIZARRE EVENTS - all within a week Information posted at Zetatalk seems to indicate that the satellites that supposed collided were far apart. Their explanation is that the PBT don't want us to know about the increase in fire balls; also want us to get use to the satellite colliding story when they start to fall from collisions with space debris. " Question: Can the Zeta's comment on the reported recent collision of US and Russian satellites. Per available information, their orbits appeared to be hundreds of kilometers apart. How could they have collided if the public is not being dubed? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_satellite_collision Orbital Apopsis: 803 km Orbital Periapsis: 778 km http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/ Orbital Periapsis: 522.0 km Orbital Apopsis: 541.0 km ZetaTalk Answer 2/14/2009: These satellites did not collide. Satellite orbits are very carefully managed, within and between countries sending them aloft. Why would it be otherwise? These are expensive machines, with much depending upon their operation. Even with the Russian satellite being inactive, no longer in use, as reported, these dead bodies are tracked by other means to ensure no collision with live satellites. A satellite may be out of control, but live satellites are in control and can be maneuvered to avoid those that are out of control. Why would a lie be spread? We have mentioned that satellites will increasingly fail, and this has been happening but has been hidden from the public. The public is to have the perception that space junk has gotten so cluttered that these types of accidents can happen, because accidents with satellites will increasingly happen. This is spin control by the establishment. What occurred over Kentucky was just another fireball, but is being booked in the media as space junk, to add an exclamation point to the colliding satellite story. Another fireball came to Earth on Sunday, February 15, 2009 and the FAA immediately promoted the space junk explanation. VIDEO: Texas Fireball http://disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/...s_FEB_16_2009/ Falling Debris over Texas 'Related to US-Russian Satellite Collision' February 15, 2009 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...collision.html Some of the callers around midmorning on Sunday reported what looked like a fireball in the sky. FAA spokesman Roland Herwig said officials suspect the debris could be related to the collision, but he said that had not been confirmed. The FAA notified pilots on Saturday to be aware of possible debris after a collision Tuesday between US and Russian communication satellites. The chief of Russia's Mission Control says clouds of debris from the collision will circle Earth and threaten numerous satellites. But a day later, the FAA spokesperson retracted his statement. "