Quote:
Originally Posted by PhiedPiper
I wouldn't throw it all together. A pattern should emerge. There are certain considerations that can be made, such as classification schemes. Sometimes it can be tricky, but getting at least a partial history behind any and all sites being considered, can really help.
I have to admit I think a bit like an algorithm because I am used to designing them.
I would say that depending on how you mean it, megalithic sites and sacred sites are usually synonymous.
Giza is really in a special case, however. It's pretty much the "hub" to which all other sites make reference, to some degree. Sites as far away as central Russia reference to it, for example.
The answer lies in infrasonic waves travelling through the earth which is something I'm looking into right now. In some parts of the world people can detect this strange low frequency sound which I believe to be these waves coincidentally resonating with a large resonator that happens to have a matching resonant frequency.
It's really all very interesting, but it will certainly take a good amount of time to make heads or tails of all the sites. It will probably be the very last piece of the puzzle to fit into place, I would say.
My next plan is to get a large world map to pin up and use thumb tacks to mark the sites. I will be buying tons of tacks of all the different colours and try different colour coding schemes to see if anything emerges.
|
So is this a matter of who reaches the sacred place first and then builds either a inhibitor or amplifier on top of it? If the sites are the same, how can we identify an inhibitor from an amplifier?