Open letter to anna hayes f drunvalo
 

I thought this deserved it's own spot as it involved two brilliant speakers

http://www.fieldwerks.com/myweb/news...alo_melchi.htm


check it out peoples.....

Re: Open letter to anna hayes f drunvalo
 

Thank you mntruthseeker. I am presently half way through the Anna Hayes lecture posted recently. I find this response by Drunvalo to be very technical, and will take a lot of time to figure this one out. Anybody else care to summarize the differences between the two techniques? I would like to compare. Thx.

Re: Open letter to anna hayes f drunvalo
 

Pertaining to the method of spinning the top and bottom "tetrahedrons" versus spinning the "star-tetrahedrons" and their direction of spin, it is clear that both our materials and methods differ. We are not even close. My intention is not to change you, but to make available to you first hand the clear unblemished version as I learned and taught it because it is misquoted in your book. Even if you do not agree with the technology, I believe that your responsibility is to quote it accurately.


I listened to Anna and I felt such a "tug"

I have deep feelings for Drunvalo and really it just sounds like a disagreement over the direction of a turn.

That simple and just like all of us, we won't always agree on everything.

I happen to feel it was a great honor to listen to both of them.

I in no way felt either s/b dishonored.

One thing to remember is Anna was actually "trained" by both sides so to speak, she tell us that herself

Re: Open letter to anna hayes f drunvalo
 

Clockwise? Or Counter-Clockwise? That is the question? Or is it Merkaba or Reverse Merkaba? In a very real sense...I don't know...and I don't care. I have been accused of being ignorant and apathetic. Why? I don't know...and I don't care! Next question!

Re: Open letter to anna hayes f drunvalo
 

Here is something to read not so very technical.:roll1:

http://www.whale.to/b/melchizedek_h.html