![]() |
Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5284173.ece
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worl...lting-U-S.html mail online. December 4, 2008 Israel is drawing up plans to attack Iran's nuclear facilities and is prepared to launch a strike without backing from the US, it has been reported. Officials in the Israeli Defence Ministry told the Jerusalem Post that while they prefer to act in consultation with the US, they were preparing plans that would allow them to act in isolation. "It is always better to coordinate," a senior Defence Ministry official told the newspaper. "But we are also preparing options that do not include coordination." However defence officials played down the reports today, telling The Times that an attack by Israeli forces alone would probably fail to take out all of Iran’s nuclear facilities, which experts say are scattered across several sites, some deep underground. Related Links Israel fears US will dither while Iran goes nuclear Iran 'has enough uranium to build a bomb' “We could not risk an operation which would only partially succeed," one defence official told The Times. "That would leave us open to a nuclear attack from Iran’s remaining weapons stock. Israel would likely need the support, the backing, of forces from a Western ally to successfully carry out the operation,” he said. A senior Israeli official quotes in the Jerusalem Post said that while it would be difficult, it would not be impossible to launch a strike against Iran without permission from the US. "There are a wide range of risks one takes when embarking on such an operation," a senior Israeli official was quoted as saying. The US Airforce controls the Iraqi airspace Israel's jets would have to cross on a bombing mission and access to codes from the Americans, would “significantly improve” Israel’s chances of a successful strike on Iran, an official told The Times. He added that because the Iranians have been moving the bunkers deep underground, sophisticated weaponry would be needed to successfully destroy the facilities. Responding to reports that Israel would use low-yield nuclear “bunker-busters”, the official said the method was largely speculative and unreliable. Ehud Olmert, the Israeli prime minister, has reportedly asked the US for a green light to attack Iranian facilities as recently as May. According to Israeli officials, the US denied the request, although it outfitted Israel with the X-band radar system which would shave several crucial minutes off Israel’s reaction time to an Iranian missile launch, and allow the United States to oversee Israel’s airspace. “There is always the option of Israel going it alone. It just does not seem like a good option at present time,” an Israeli MP told the Times. There are three central locations where experts believe Iranian facilities are producing goods for nuclear weapons. Israeli officials named these sites as: Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges produce enriched uranium; Isfahan, where 250 tons of gas are stores in tunnels; and Arak, where a heavy water reactor produces plutonium. Israeli officials said they were heartened that international sanctions on Iran were having an effect, but did not feel they were enough to stop Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. The most recent Israeli intelligence reports estimate that Iran will have enough enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon in late 2009, barring any interruptions in its programme. "There is still time and there is no need to rush into an operation right now," another Israeli official said. "The regime there is already falling apart and will likely no longer be in power 10 years from now." On Monday, Teheran dismissed the possibility of an Israeli strike, saying it didn't take Israel seriously. "We think that regional and international developments and the complicated situation faced by Israel itself will not allow it to launch military strikes against other countries," Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi told reporters in Teheran, adding that "Israel makes threats to promote its psychological and media warfare. Some Israeli security officials fear that the Iranian retaliation for a strike on its facilities could include a large-scale missile attack on Israel from several Iranian allies, disruption of oil supplies to the West, and terror attacks against Jewish targets around the world. |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Not very smart for Israel to do this, but then again that's nothing new. :lmfao:
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
Speaking of nothing new, the last thing I expect is to see no backing from the U.S. Who are they fooling? -feeler |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
AIPAC is a very strong influence and will ultimately succeed in bringing about America's demise unless we make people aware of the threat that this unelected power group poses to our citizenry. :ghostrider_h4h: We, as Americans, have been forced to take on the billionaires' bad debts and way exceed our capacity to wage war abroad. The average person here is completely unaware of the nature of these forces and through false media-inspired nationalistic hatred quite willing to kill people in other countries to avoid a false terror threat. :chair: This consistent dumbed-down media effect seems to be wearing thin and more people are becoming aware that they've been lied to - BIGTIME! We can all help each other by gently steering the awareness of people towards what is obvious and unifying; our own survival. Don't try for immediate conversions, but sow the seeds of knowledge and let the roots of understanding take hold in each consciousness you encounter. A rising tide lifts all goats. :boat: Free your mind, and, well, you know the rest. :wink2: |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
...old message....:naughty:
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
US military is in Iraq not for oil alone ... I was told. On an old part of the homepage of Project Camelot (now moved to archive) Dan Burisch mentioned this: Genesis 3:24 (V) "eiecitque Adam et conlocavit ante paradisum voluptatis cherubin et flammeum gladium atque versatilem ad custodiendam viam ligni vitae" Translated in English (http://www.biblegateway.com) it says: Genesis 3:24 (New Living Translation) 24 After sending them out, the Lord God stationed mighty cherubim to the east of the Garden of Eden. And he placed a flaming sword that flashed back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life. Now if Iraq is considered to be the ancient area of the garden of Eden and Iran is east to it .... What special reason could they have to engage in Iran in the coming years ? Cheers |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
I just hope that Krzysztof Jackowski's recent words will not come true. He has said that the war is a matter of months and that everything is already in motion. However..remember about our collective consciousness and do not give up hope for a better future.
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Its realy on the edge right now. I hope this is going good for us all.
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
An interesting notion when you take into consideration that Russia has already vowed to back Iran if such an attack were to be carried out.
I'll be keeping an eye on this one. |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
What would you do? |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
IDF Girl. Pretty, isn't she? |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
Someone should take the toys away from the big babies because they've clearly shown that their only answer to violence against them is to counter with more violence. |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
Israel gets no sympathy from me and that is the same for other countries in that region. |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
Good link thx for that. Hollywood is terrible it even changes history to make films :thumbdown: |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Very true swanster.Manipulated info. to suit and 'thrill' an audience and keep people believing in falseties-the point is that truths are all so blatant and in your face; we are blinded to the obvious and without the prima it's a little difficult to connect the dots.As soon as you start getting a sniff of truths that have been witheld then an awakening process begins and you start asking more questons and searching for the answers to them, not content with what the popular media are feeding you.I become branded as a 'loon' for even suggesting alternate theories for events as the mask of deceit pervades most people's consciousness through the popular media-even the newspapers that people read are a part of it-they're adept at mixing small amounts of truth with ongoing lies,designed to throw you in disarray and put you off the scent.This makes it more difficult for alternative theorists and truth seekers to persuade the masses to at least take a look from behind the curtain or from an audience perspective and try looking at it from the director's chair.
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
What better way to remain hidden than to keep those masses actively afraid of each other and opposed to one another to the point of never having the attention free to examine that string they are dangling from? I somehow doubt that a school teacher in Israel has any real quarrel with an Iranian shop keeper. Why should either be "burned"? |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
these have been my thoughts the whole time. as well as why we wiped out the native american culture here in america. control of the ancient spiritual teachings. the native americans of the time were willing to share there land. even helped us. I always thought thanksgiving was a warped holiday. but after all we did win the war. this one is no different. |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
And then again, that's nothing new either. :naughty: |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
if they do this it means all out war and to be quite honest id rather this not
happen considering id probly be sent to fight and i really dont wann go fight a world war but if i have let it be war haha :lightsabre: |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
Quote:
|
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
I can't believe the gall of Bush=i'm sure most people are now aware that 9/11 was an inside job and he says this:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/worldN...4B44S120081205 Fri Dec 5, 2008 5:18pm GMT Tabassum Zakaria WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush said on Friday that Iran's nuclear program remained a threat to peace and the United States would not allow Tehran to develop an atomic weapon. The West has offered Iran diplomatic and economic incentives to suspend uranium enrichment and to support a civilian nuclear power program, Bush said in a speech he planned to give to the Saban Forum later in the day. "While Iran has not accepted these offers, we have made our bottom line clear: For the safety of our people and the peace of the world, America will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon," Bush said in the speech released by the White House. Amid hopeful signs of political, economic and social reforms advancing in the Middle East, serious challenges remain, Bush said. "Iran and Syria continue to sponsor terror, Iran's uranium enrichment remains a major threat to peace, and many in the region still live under oppression," he said. Bush defended his decision to go to war against Iraq in March 2003 and topple Saddam Hussein, saying that after the September 11, 2001, attacks the United States could not risk the threat Baghdad posed at that time. "It is true, as I have said many times, that Saddam Hussein was not connected to the 9/11 attacks," Bush said. But after nearly 3,000 people died in the September 11 attacks, the United States had to decide whether it could tolerate an enemy that supported terrorism and was believed to have weapons of mass destruction, and found "this was a risk we could not afford to take." Weapons of mass destruction were never found in Iraq after the U.S.-led invasion, and this is considered a major intelligence failure. Bush in a recent television interview said the faulty intelligence on Iraq was the biggest regret of his presidency. "When Saddam's regime fell, we refused to take the easy option and install a friendly strongman in his place," Bush said. "Even though it required enormous sacrifice, we stood by the Iraqi people as they elected their own leaders and built a young democracy." He acknowledged that efforts have not always gone according to plan and sometimes fell short, saying "the fight in Iraq has been longer and more costly than expected." |
Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants
right on, northern boy.
joe, you'd be welcome in my guesthouse. you wouldn't be the first draft dodger to hide out in the peace country. seems appropriate somehow. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon