![]() |
Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
I have some thoughts on the economy that I would love to get some responses to:
First: Capitalism (and I'm using a narrow, economic definition: a market system subject to the laws of supply and demand) was born out of colonialism. The death knell of fuedalistic mercantilism was the "discovery" of two continents; one filled with gold, the other with abundant naval resources, and both with potential sources of labor. Capitalism was born through the physical exapansion of nations and resource exploitation. Second: The very expansion that gave rise to the market systems now practiced globally is required to sustain this particular economic system. Capitalism is unsustainable without continued growth. The economist Keynes understood this very well, and his views drove the expansion of global Capitalism in the last half of the 20th century - despite the weakness of Keynesian economics exposed by the abusrdities of "Regeanomics" in the 1980s. "Rising tides lift all boats" thinking has limped along regardless - for whatever reason (insert illuminati theories here if you wish) - and expansion still means the acquisition of more resources, more territory, etc. What do most economists, politicians, and CEOs agree will spark most of the wars in the 21st Century? Natural resources - primarily fossil fuels and arable land. Capitalism does not necessarily mandate conquest, but that is how it came to be, how it exists today, and is predicted by most involved to continue. Third: If we were to wake up tomorrow, and all the mechanisms of Capitalism were forever gone, would that really be a bad thing? So what if the dollar collapses? So what if the power goes out and grocery stores run out of food? Such a chaotic event would certainly lead to immediate wide-spread death and destruction on the planet, but is that really any worse than the orderly, well planned death and destruction we have today? The "economic collapse" as spoken of in the mainstream and alternative media is not deserving of the panic it commands. Just some thoughts - let me know what you think. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
|
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
That is the kicker about FDR, not only did he convince them that it could be fixed, he side-stepped others who were asking whether or not it should be fixed. There was actually a pretty healthy debate about that in the 1930s, and some communinst party members were actually elected to governerships and other positions - believe it or not, primarily in the West. It was an opportunity lost, and does seem to fit with claims about FDR's involvement with a NWO/illuminati/world banking shadow group.
What is sad is that when these fundamental questions about Capitalism are raised in mainstream arenas, the timeless insult of "communist" gets flung - even in the so-called "left-wing media." Thanks for the reply, I was getting lonly. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
We are living in 'interesting times' I mean 'interesting times' in the sense of the traditional Chinese curse – may you live in interesting times. Thus one might say, the sacking of Rome was interesting, or the Nazi era in Germany was interesting. These were times when major changes were afoot – but not times one would necessarily choose to live through oneself. We today, however, have no choice. The whole world is passing through 'interesting times', and the changes afoot are profound. Consider for example the recent conflict in Georgia, and the sudden polarization that has arisen between Washington and Moscow. The Western mainstream media has been presenting those events in a very distorted, propagandistic way, so it's not obvious on the surface what really happened in Georgia, what is the meaning of Russia's response, and what is the meaning of Washington's response to Russia's response. The first thing to realize is that everything that is happening around Georgia has been planned out well in advance by the usual suspects in Washington. The events have not in any sense been caused by tensions in the Caucus, rather those tensions have provided a convenient venue for Washington to pursue its grand designs. Washington armed and trained the Georgian forces, and in the weeks prior to Georgia's attack on South Ossetia, US & Georgian forces engaged in joint military exercises. This has been a 'psy-op' – an incident arranged by the US in an attempt to demonize and isolate Russia. The second thing to realize is that Russia has no interest whatsoever in conflict. By this I don't mean 'Russia is good', but rather 'Russia is sensible'. The conflicts now and to come are entirely the creation of US/UK/EU elites, in their pursuit of global domination. The Georgian attack on South Ossetia was as if Serbia were to attack the capital of Kosovo – and you can imagine the violence of the US/NATO retaliation against Serbia if that were to happen. The Russian response, by contrast, was not at all disproportionate. The third thing to realize – and this is well known in both Washington and Moscow – is that the US has been preparing for many years to carry out a nuclear first-strike against Russia. That's what Reagan's 'Star Wars' was about, and the thread continues to space-based lasers, new kinds of tactical nukes, US bases surrounding Russia and China, radar stations in the Czech Republic, and the missiles in Poland. The fourth thing to realize is the reason why this first strike is critical to US/EU elite interests. Without it, the overwhelming balance of global power will shift to Eurasia, to Russia and China. Eurasia is growing rapidly economically and structurally, while the US & EU are in terminal economic decline – and these trends are not going to change without decisive military intervention. The US has always been very clever about the wars it's gotten into, always managing to blame its own aggression and conquest on the victim. Pearl Harbor is the most famous example – the Day of Infamy. We now know that President Roosevelt schemed systematically to provoke the Japanese to the point where they had no choice but to respond militarily. We know that the Japanese codes had been broken, the lookouts sent home, and Pearl Harbor left intentionally undefended. Roosevelt knew exactly when the attack was going to happen, and sent the strategically important aircraft carriers out to sea and safety. Those left in the harbor were sacrificed as so many pawns in an anti-Japanese psy-op so that America could enter the war as 'the good guy', 'the offended party'. Infamy indeed. The US is now pursuing that same basic script with Russia. The Georgian incident was merely the opening salvo. The plan is to poke the Russian Bear again and again, each time forcing it to roar and swipe with its military claws. Each time it swipes, that will be another 'proof' of Russian aggressiveness. The radar and missile installations are pokes, and other pokes could be delivered by admitting the Ukraine to NATO or by imposing a blockade on Iran. If the US tries to rebuild Georgia's military, that is a poke Russia has already said it would swipe at. These 'pokes' would be like Russia installing nuclear missiles in Cuba or Mexico, and one can understand why Washington could not tolerate that, and would take the installations out with so-called 'precision' bombing raids – for justifiable defensive reasons. Similarly, Russia is likely to take out the missiles in Poland, just before they are scheduled to be operational. Except in this case Russia will be accused by the West of carrying out an unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation that had 'done nothing wrong'. All hail the power of spin. This game of 'poke and swipe' is entirely under the control of Washington. They can pace the pokes, and their severity, depending on how far the Pentagon has progressed with its first-strike weapons systems. When the systems are all go, the US can deliver a big poke, the kind that might cause Russia to sink one of the Pentagon's big carriers. Then with a cry of "Russia started it", the first strike would be launched – indeed the stealth B1's would probably be airborne before the carrier even gets hit. I'm not saying nuclear war is absolutely inevitable, but it is more likely in the near future than it ever was during the Cold War. In those days the US was content to isolate Russia, so that US and its 'allies' could have a free hand exploiting the so-called 'Free World'. Mutual assured destruction worked fine for that era. But now the US has strong reasons to want to actually destroy Russia, and is clearly pursuing that agenda militarily, diplomatically, and with psy-ops. This new era of polarization, created by Washington and threatening armageddon, is one of the profound changes now afoot in our world. There's not room here to go into similar detail with each of the other profound changes, so I'll summarize some of them for now: • The current 'economic slump', or 'credit crisis', is not a cyclic phenomenon, as they're trying to make us believe. Rather these things are the beginning of profound, historic, economic shifts. We will not return again to 'business as usual'; things are going get much worse for us in the West economically. For one thing, we are seeing the mantle of capitalist hegemony moving from the US & Europe to China. Similarly, beginning in the late 1800s, the mantle passed from Imperial Britain to America. Earlier it passed from the Dutch Provinces to an emerging British Empire, and before that from the Genoese banking network to the Dutch Provinces. That's the nature of capitalism: each round of capital accumulation ends up unintentionally financing a successor hegemonic power. At the same time, capitalism as-a-whole is running up against global limits it has never had to deal with before. Obviously growth cannot continue forever on a finite planet with finite resources, and we are now at the point where the unstoppable force is colliding with the immovable object. • US and EU elites are absolutely committed to creating a centralized EU government, with all semblance of sovereignty removed from national governments, and with no democratic accountability. The European Commission, which wields all the power in Brussels, is not elected, and it takes its orders from financial elites. There are two major objectives behind this drive for centralization. The first objective is to impose neoliberal policies on all of Europe – total privatization, low corporate taxes, deregulation of corporate abuses, drastic reductions in public services and welfare payments, etc. While the very rich will continue to get richer, the general standard of living in the EU will be declining down toward third-world levels. As usual, the future can be seen first in the USA, whose cities are filled with the homeless and with crime, and where something like 40% of the population lacks adequate access to health care. This is the response of Western elites to the economic shifts that are underway globally – pass the suffering on to the general population. The second objective is to turn the EU into an imperialist military power, most likely involving conscription, so that EU elites can play a more active role in the geopolitical games that will be unfolding – assuming armageddon is somehow avoided. Already Ireland has given up its traditional neutrality, with its hosting of US military and rendition flights, and its participation in imperialist occupation operations, euphemistically called 'peacekeeping missions'. The people of Ireland are to be congratulated for their wisdom in voting No to the Lisbon Treaty, but we need to be prepared for the same wolf to return in different clothing. He was rebuffed in his Constitutional garb and his Lisbon garb, but he'll be back more determined than ever, huffing and puffing and threatening to blow our houses down if we don't let him in. The Irish government is loyal not to us but to Brussels, so they'll be doing all they can to sneak the wolf in the back door. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
A little capitalism doesn't hurt.
Its just when it gets out of the marketplace and affects infrastructure that we run into problems. Very insightful post though and it leads me to get a bit of an epiphany on some other issues.Thought provoking. Thanks for the conjure. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Excellent article, and thank you for posting.
I heard Condy Rice's spiel the other day on NPR, where she said Russia was on a path to "self imposed isolation and international irrelevance." Puhleeez . . . Russia controls one of the largest natural gas reserves on the planet at a time when fossil fuel use has YET to reach its peak. Putin could moon the United States delegate on the floor of the UN, and still command more "relevance" than say, France or Spain in the world. The same could be said for China, with its manufacturing and banking explosion. Both China and Russia don't really have to respond to any criticism from the West - they don't have to. That fits with what the author said about war provoked by the west. What are your thoughts on Benjamin Fulford, and his views of the east-west economic dichotomy that has emerged since the fall of the Berlin Wall? |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
It seems to me that the most life saving humanity centric event possible, in this moment, would be for the US fiscal system to be abandoned or collapsed, through either chaos or orchestration (which may be the same thing).
I say this because it might reduce the insanity of war in many forms, such as direct physical conflict and the more subtle economic hitman type conflicts, which lead to the same ends, human suffering. This is why the Ron Paul campaign was an interesting curiosity for me to ponder, as, to remove the IRS and the Federal Reserve, his stated goals, was effectively to remove most of the government itself, leading towards PEACE, similar to the storyline in the fabulous book Cra$hmaker. Lease Peace ~ namaste ~ |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
|
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
greetings |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Wow,
This thread brings me comfort as we civilly dialog and present. Quick, we need an instigator to get it off track and heated! My deep concern is with orchestration, yet it remains my great hope, in glorious paradox. I think we have a chaotic universe and economic microcosm, whereby the Knights feel they can direct and maneuver it in their intended directions, such as a collapse to provide a global control of increased intensity. While it has been a grueling His-Story of continual and advancing oppression, perhaps we are all alive NOW to witness the real transitions, a free and loving market of exchange based on respect and sovereignty, perhaps I'm delusional too. I DUNNO! I do know I don't want to subsist/exist on the backs of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 or any other number of '3rd' world slaves, whether they be in the US (soon?) or anywhere on the globe, so for me, I'm super-down-sizing, I wanna be a wisp with a micro-footprint. ~ namaste / Got a Plan? ~ |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
I'm glad this thread fills you with positivity Zynox.
There is some great work out there for reading if you are interested in learning about exchange, or pre-capitalist, economies. THE BEST, the book that sort of changed my life, is a book by French Anthropologist Maurice Godelier titled "The Mental and the Material." He has another book out, "The Enigma of the Gift," which is partly his own views on gift giving, and partly a critique of another, early twentieth century anthropologist named Marcel Mauss. One other name worth mentioning is Claude Meiliaseux [sic - I never can spell the guy's name right unless I'm looking at it, sorry], who wrote "The Anthropology of Slavery," and "Maidens, Meal, and Money." All of these works give insight into the process called "articulation," which is the way exchange/pre-capitalist economies succumb to external market forces. I'm also going to instant messenge you on another point, so as not to derail the thread. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Thanks for the book recommendations HistoryCircus,
My favorite read on future look from current money replacement endeavors is Health Money Healthy Planet. ~ namaste / Got Ideas? ~ |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
I watched the Fulford video on teh China quake many times. IF it was due to HAARP, the Chinese are certainly aware, but have chosen to do nothing, perhaps they recognize that time is on their side. Every time I hear or see something about the Berlin Wall I'm reminded by the prophetic lyrics of Leonard Cohen written, I think, almost 15 years ago: Give me back the Berlin wall give me Stalin and St Paul I've seen the future, brother: it is murder It's only recently that I've come to understand that the collapse of the Berlin Wall meant the end to any impediments to rapacious capitalism - at least in the West. One only has to look down south, to events in Venezuela and Bolivia to see that the beast has its limitations. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
All I am certain of, as fact, is that the laced trails in the skies were not present when I was a child, teen or in my 20s. I first observed them around 1997. ~ namaste / Chem-Trails - Got a Theory?~ |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
i beleive the current system is defunct now and wil not be recoverable.im not bothered about it crashing apart form the untold suffering of the human population still trapped and asleep in their material prisons. ill justy get on with it whatever comes. i just want to be ready thats all, food, equipment, seeds, survival gear.then get networking inot commune type existences. if we get left alone that is;/
|
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
I too feel sorry for those still asleep, and for those who don't recognize that there are other ways. I think the powers that be have done a great job getting us to use the phrase "free markets" instead of "market system" in reference to Capitalism. Market systems, by their very nature, are already free. The term "free market" is an oxymoron. The "free" has been added to tie it with notions of "freedom," which is patriotic, etc. To challenge the "market system" does not invoke the sentiments of cultural treason quite like challenging "free markets." Because, as we know, challenging "free markets" means that one must support unfree markets, and is therefore an unpatriotic, devil worshipping traitor.
I too want to be prepared before it all goes to ****, and I think many of us will be, and can help those who don't quite get it together in time. Thanks for your comments |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
HistoryCircus,
You have jarred loose a meme for me, in the application of free markets as a phrase. I suppose I fell into a trap on this, as there are a variety of market types, regulated markets, bars and meat markets (smiles), global and local markets, etc. So it felt ok to use the predecessor free with markets, as it seemed to ensure which markets were referenced. But now, I suspect that you are spot on my friend, I absorbed a meme which I shall endeavor to unmeme (tm). With my inherent respect for sovereignty, I find I have also associated the two, like the free market phrased parasitically attached itself to my deeper core orientation towards all things sovereign. What I see for the next three to nine weeks is cascading markets, and, impacts across the lands. ~ namaste ~ |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
You know what is interesting Zynox? I almost used the word "meme" in that last post, and figured it might lose some. But meme it is - for many, Capitalism means exactly that: "free" markets. That is why so many don't want to let go . . .
|
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
As I think about it more, I agree with Zynox - how in the hell can one look at what is going on and conclude something different. The markets are indeed going to head even further south in the coming weeks.
Those counting on liquid currency to prepare - to create those "radiant zones" - need to do that stuff now. If you have credit cards, you could, if you buy these theories, stockpile, and help those who will find you. When the smoke clears, those companies will not be hunting you down. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
|
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
That is how they get you. You carry thier symbols in your wallet. So do I. It was a system designed and imposed on us before our births (unless you're like 80 or something). We are waking up, however, and will soon have a choice. Fair exchange, or exchange for profit? The solace I take from the coming collapse is that that very question will be decided by us. I hope we make the right one.
Keep your cheer and your humor - despite the crap. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Folks, Friends,
This may turn out to be a long post, I am never certain when I plant the seed how high the tree will grow. We have somewhat diverted from HistoryCircus' (not sure where to put that apostrophe, the old rules escape me) post, yet I really am enthused by what we are discussing here, so many cool tangents. I am fortunate (how the hell that happened or why escapes me) to have no debt and a minor preservation of wealth (so far!), 90% in metal. Yet, with all my engagement in research and exposure to great writers and minds, I still get enchanted by the memes, perhaps because they are so numerous and well orchestrated and financed, I DUNNO! What I have found is most intriging, and that is, statistically unproven, 99.23145 % of the US population doesn't seem to recall honest money, backed by restrictive silver and gold. I routinely give silver dollars as tips when I eat out, and often the 'value' of the tip is 40-90% of the bill. I slip these discretely into the check holder with a business card sized deal that says "Your service has been as precious to me as this genuine silver dollar" and goes on to briefly talk about the shenanigans amplified by fiat paper money, the Federal Reserve and that it all leads to war. I always glance later, hanging out like a spy, to gauge reactions, and mostly, recipients are excited to hold it, to show it off and usually it passes many hands. All I can conclude from these fun moments is that there is some core gene, some core knowing, some core magnetic attraction by humans to these elusive metals. In the end, as I have exhaustively exposed and expelled here on Avalon, the stuff is a tool, a mechanism to control the government, to limit war and to preserve wealth as we transition, from here/now to there/now. ~ namaste / Attracted to Shiny Metals? ~ |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Perhaps silver, gold, and platinum exude a field magnetic (or magic), in conjunction with other magnetic and gravitational fields, that keeps us paying attention - for some reason.
Hell, I don't know. Honest money has been long gone before you and I were born. Andrew Jackson, despite being a disgusting, racist, Indian hating killer, warned us about transferring our system to paper. He hated Biddle, the father of our central banking system. His hate was probably wrong, but his apprehension about the use of paper, symbolic script seems right on. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Capitalism is doomed.
It is a matter of evolution; capitalism should have gone to the next step long ago, that is, the stage whereby some social justice, the environment, the Spiritual needs of People... would be taken into serious consideration. Only having a Human face - that is evolving into some sort of scientific and technological socialism - could yet save this system and all the good things it could have provided to mankind, provided it would be guided by Reason and not greed alone. Regards, RaKaR, www.futureofmankind.co.uk |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
If we face a future where it is up to us to create a new economic system, could we return to the use of the market, or are we better off finding another way? Perhaps a return to principles of exchange? Should we consider some sort of socialism - despite the failures observed in the old USSR?
|
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
1) I have been sensing the orchestrated collapse for 23 years, so there may be a few tricks and lucky charms still played. One thought on this is they are about ready to bleed the last drops, what would the rush be, maybe they stage 3, 4 or 5 more cycles of doom and totally exhaust all opposition in the process ... this is an antique game played that has gone hyperbolic, but has not concluded. 2) While it is a cool fantasy to extract back from the money changers, there is potential for a new culture of total morale hazardists (tm) and I don't want to exchange one oppression for another. It is fine if people genuinely tried to maintain a mortgage and send their bank jingle mail keys back and walk away, yet, to me, quite another issue to intentionally default. Under that premise, then the next time one feels slighted, they may, through their own conditioning, rinse and repeat this now accepted behavior. Quote:
*) Read Cra$hmaker: A Federal Affaire 0) Bring every US soldier home and teach them to repair the failing infrastructure or arrest corrupt politicians, judges and corporate executives 1) Disband every alphabet soup agency 2) Dump IRS 3) Dump Federal Reserve 4) Tax US corporations or any corporation based upon US sales 5) Use a sales tax only on discretionary items to make up shortfall 6) Legalize all drugs and freeze the funding source of money laundering and covert operations 7) Slowly watch the impact of the first 6 steps and create the next steps 8) Figure out if we want to replace the executive branch, courts and congress since Ron Paul and a few others would be so lonely after step 0 above. 9) Let the other nations decide what they want to do in their sovereign zones ... and use the fancy haarp and other undisclosed weapons to protect the borders until things evolve across the globe ... perhaps instituting that everyone running for the temporary management replacement for congress has a son or daughter in the military concurrently with the parent's single term ... I really would not want a military at all, AT ALL, like Costa Rica, but these issues must be addressed .... ~ the government IS AN ANARCHY, they wanna keep you out of that playground ~ |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Hi Historiycircus,
I don't know about the USSR model; what is almost certain though is that we have to find some other way of running the economy, integrating it in the wider phenomenon, which Existence is. Bear also in mind that the USSR , historically, was a premature, rather artificially created and implimented(maybe even forced) upon People and the Objective Circumstances. The USSR jumped from Feodalism to Socialism, ignoring the necessary phase of Capitalistic Experience, which Experience in its turn should at a certain point evolve into Socialism, where some harmony should be between and in the interaction, cooperation Mankind-Nature-Other Life Forms. The technological, scientific and technical progres, which capitalism creates, should facilitate and render the next step possible, for People free of the need and fear of solely physical survivor(food, water, shelter...), would develop Spritually and grow towards a better understanding of the complexity of Life, beginning with the realization of the Oneness of all Life Forms in the inner principles and natural Laws of Earth - the fellow Human Being in the first place. A closed look, would reveal that the small Communities who are now(forcefully!) trying to create with the precious assistance of Project Avalon( thanks, Kerry and Bill!) are but an expression of that necessary historical step, were we to survive our own madness. Regards, RaKaR www.futureofmankind.co.uk |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Good post and thoughts from all.
The American "Corporation" is bankrupt and is collapsing but I sincerely hope it doesn't take all the good folks with it. As for Russia, my belief is that the truth about how life has changed there has been kept from us. Look at this for instance: http://carolynbaker.net/site/content/view/313/ A return to sociallism? I think the time of the "isms" to solve our challenges is gone - what we need are communities based on trust, caring and service. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
Interesting link and thanks. Russia has certainly gone through transformations, though it would appear on the surface that the eco-villages are simply a return to the earlier community farms with the addition of environmentalism. While I share your distrust of 'isms,' I question the pragmatism of creating small communities that do not share an ideology. There have been movements over the centuries of people attempting the same thing which have failed. The communes of the 60s are a case in point. Besides, I don't think any of us would want to forego all of the benefits that have come from globalization - including the internet - and go back to laboring for long hours just to sustain ourselves. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
The eco-villages, I believe , have a similar aim to the community farms; that is, to benefit the Russian economy. I have posted elsewhere the contribution that the cooperatives have made to the Russian agricultural economy, amounting to 2.3% of Russian GDP in 2004, for instance. However, the eco-village movement is different in that it takes advantage of a recent Russian law change which allows individuals/families to take up land, free of charge, in order to support themselves/their family. All produce is tax free and the land is yours to pass on to your family. As for an ideology behind it, I agree that a community movement needs one. The ideology for the Russian eco-villages, the "Kins Domain" concept, comes from the books by Vladimir Megre which I can thoroughly recommend. Your last comment, with respect, I think typifies the point of view that a living from the land is a return to the dark ages. I already labour long hours in a job just to sustain myself and my family, a job which unfortunately exists only to support the economic system which is doing so much damage to our world. I would gladly exchange that meaningless labour for a chance to develop my own domain on land I own, deriving as much of my survival needs as I could from it. In addition, I would welcome the chance to reconnect with the Earth and my fellow Human Beings in a spirit of cooperation rather than competition, which our present economic system relies on. I believe I could do it, with a suitable support system, in less time than I devote to my job. I do agree with you that we don't need to be "luddites" and dispose of technology, only use it for good. I believe there is much surpressed technology which needs to come to the fore, technonolgy that could solve our energy problems once and for all, for instance. I believe that living in a way which does no harm to the Earth and to others will have other, non-tangible/spiritual benefits. As we expand our consciousness, we will free our minds to invent all kinds of clean/ethical technology which will benefit all. This is my hope, anyway! |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Good post P and G,
Will these communities really need a unifying ideology? Or will the pragmatic necessities of reproducing society amid the theorized impending calamities be enough? I would hate emergent "radiant zones" to not be an option for the needy simply because they don't buy into a particular philosophy. Permit me a second thought: Pre-capitalist (exchange), capitalist and socialist modes of production require a centralized form of resource management, but of the three, pre-capitalist modes of production require the least amount of centralization for efficient and fair resource use. Since centralization is the road to corruption - at least historically - should we be creating economic models for the future based on exchange economics? Should that be our focus, in terms of economy, in our plans to feed and clothe the "radiant zones?" |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
It will be something completely new and synergistic, a little bit of all and then some more... Order out of chaos - works for those with positive and negative intent - the question will be - who decides on the new order?
Economics rules all other subjects and values in today’s world, we need to understand why this illusionary and unsustainable system rule our very existence, before we can begin to shift to the new paradigm. To change to a more just, equitable and sustainable “need” paradigm, the understanding of how the current economy works, with its consequences for people, society and ecosystems is needed. In my opinion true wealth stems from the earth and all her resources and a local economy based on the skillful, sensitive use of local, natural resources will provide the best foundation for a sustainable economic future. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Exceptional ideas and discussion here. This is becoming a very impacting thread for me, these are the important, challenging questions.
I keep forming a strong emotion, that we arrived here in steps and sequences, and the most successful transformations will probably be in transitions away from here. While there will be total 'radical' changes attempted by some, the next genuine waves feel like they will be sequenced. At each step, there will be new wisdom gained from the previous step. I find this handy as I read these posts, and imagine if we had, as one option, really productive agri-communities with some of the 'luxuries' of the current day, afforded through released alternative and progressive energy systems. After long hours in the field, an opportunity to surf the web to connect with other communities, like we are here, and now. ~ namaste ~ |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Hi Matrix,
I appreciate your comments, and your optimism. I bring up these issues though, for preparation purposes. Much of what we do may end up being "on the fly," so to speak, but I'm just throwing this stuff out for debate now while we still have the luxury of discussion, and are not burdened by the necessity of action. |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
Cutting edge technology (with the matching consciousness) will be an integral part of a new economy. Thinking more in terms of Free Energy and Anti-gravity as opposed to petroleum …that will be a momentous leap torwards a new economic model... |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
“You earn, you buy, Pay taxes and die” enslavement of the human race has been the accepted norm. I look around me and I see how people struggle in a robotic way to make sense of their world, to cover their debts/expenses, to earn a living. I see how we are manipulated by the “men behind the curtain”. I see people killed in senseless wars, children die of hunger and preventable diseases. I see how we busy ourselves with mind-numbing entertainment and -activities to silence our spirit’s cry for freedom, growth and a just world. Mammon is busy winning the game…welcome to the New World Order… meet your new masters… We need a New World Consciousness to counter this. All is not lost - Shift happens…there are many waking up to the new realities, little pockets of light all over the globe are busy lighting up. Now that I know that “all life is a stage”, that I have seen through the illusions and urgency of our time what can I do to empower myself and others? There is Knowing, then there is Doing and Being. Now that I Know, what am I to Do? My answer? Just walk away from the illusion and deception of the money trap, turn away from “the system”. This new World Order pyramid of power and manipulation is build upon You and Me at the base. If enough of us step out of it, this pyramid will come crumbling down. Co-create your new reality. Become self sufficient. Find community with like-minded individuals to do it with. The answer might not be the same for everybody – find your own personal answer, educate yourself, become knowledgeable about the NWO and their occult agenda, then DO something with that new knowledge, plant, learn, move, grow, share…shift. Do in order to Be your own true self – let your light shine. We stand on a threshold of a New World paradigm... I am walking away from the Old paradigm…hopeful that I will discover more of my true self while exploring new concepts of existence and enjoying the flow of life…I am off in three weeks time in search of an eco community… I might be the one “wandering” through your neighbourhood…so please, be nice to strangers... **** The varied responses to this open letter was amazing to say the least - old friends lost, new friends found. I will need you guys to carry on this debate and find workable solutions...fast!:yikes: |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
~ namaste ~ |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Quote:
I nominate thee to the future community committee of sustainable rational ideas, and note that there is no 'ism' included ... ~ in great respect of matrix, for the shared creativity, and my next Bumper Sticker > SHIFT HAPPENS ~ |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Hello all,
Good discussion, deep thoughts being shared indeed - and Zynox, you drew a pretty charming perspective there. I definitely would like to live this type of simple, meanful existence! I truly do not have much to add to your stances, gentlemen; i just would like to suggest not to focus too much on the names which would eventually be used to designate the kind of future reality we all long for, crave for and - judging by the mood on this Forum - which we are, this time, really willing to create and sustain. The 'isms' and what we used to identify with them should also belong to the past paradigm; what really matter, in my humble view, is the substance, the degree of Wisdom and self awareness upon which we would base our future thoughts, decisions, choices and actions. Call it 'social project'; 'Enlightened Capitalism';'Higher Natural Existence' ...what ever you think suits, it does not matter much. Only the content does. Peace and Wisdom. Rakar. www.futureofmankind.co.uk |
Re: Capitalism, Sustainability, and the Possibility of Global Collapse
Rakar and Zynox,
You both make good points, which has me asking yet another question. Can we not take what has worked (in terms of economic behavior), what has been valuable to our existence here, with us when we cross the threshhold of whatever is coming? Must we throw the baby out with the bathwater, or is that a terrible way to conceptualize our potential situations? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon