New Wilcock Interview
 

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...d=59174&cmd=tc

or on Davids site.

Recorded 27/01/10

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Thank you. Site is bookmarked and I will listen to it this evening.

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Your welcome :thumb_yello:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

I been looking for this site for awhile now. Thanks. They did a interview with Dr. Rick Strassman about his DMT studies. I could never remember where I heard it.

I like David. Its always fun and engaging to hear him talk. And almost a full hour and 1/2. Nice.:thumb_yello:


Thanks aroundthetable!



peace:original:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Thanks for this information, I'm downloalding it as I write to listen to later.

In Peace and Unity,
Roman:thumb_yello:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Firstlook and Roman, pleased to be of service :original:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Haha. I love David and can't wait to here it I am gonna listen right away.:thumb_yello:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Enjoy Joe!

Have to say personally it didnt do it for me. :zip:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

This interview I just listen it was excellent.... no extra comment needed :thumb_yello:

Tomaz

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

I would like to say that David Wilcock has such a brilliant mind and I have to wonder why he tries to convince so many people about Obama and anything else he might say. To say what he believes is enough and it is refreshing to hear.

For what its worth, I hope he is right

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

More punk less jazz!! :naughty:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

He has learned by his experience.

No so long ago, people being awakened had to keep quiet on this subject otherwise they would be killed (by ordinary people) not even the PTB would need to be involved - this knowledge was dangerous and so strange and people would not want to hear it.

Now you can speak out about the truth and the worse that happens is people don't by your CD's and you get a few flames on forums and some crappy email.

This is progress people! Really - that isn't a joke. Its a measure of sorts that defines where we are.

I personally think Mr Wilcock knows a lot more than he lets on because he has learned what will happen when peoples core beliefs are challenged - and that includes a good percentage of the so-called "new-age" crowd.

Your think with Ra backing your six you'd be smarter - but then I think DW doesn't always listen to his higher-self as much as he could/(should). In fact if you read the book (Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce - something like that title anyway ;) ) you see the arguments Ra has with DW who always wants to do his stuff at the expense of assisting Ra on elaborating his messages etc.

I see this happening more and more as DW "does" Hollywood! Thats why I listen and read less than I did before.

I still think he is a stellar dude and has done more in service than most of us put together.

A..

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

I have just been listening to DW, why is he talking so much about his skills as a jazz drummer? Why doesn't he just play a track and we can judge for ourselves how good he is.

When I first heard him a couple of years ago, I was impressed, he connected a lot of the dots which I had been trying to connect myself, and provided it in a slick presentation, but there was nothing original there, it was based on the mayan calendar, the work of nassim Harramein and others. Now he is still just repeating stuff that he picks up from the Internet, and worse he limits his information to PC witnesses such as Petersen and Fulford.

The whole thing is getting too incestuous and is becoming a nightmare of egos DW, Fulford, Deagle and Bob Dean (bless him) not to mention Burisch, Hoagland and Greer. This is going to get worse as the information starts becoming mainstream and as more people fall down the rabbit hole, there is a real danger that many are going to get led off the path by following gurus and false prophets.

Be your own guru.

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Hi folks,
Very interesting lets see what comes next !

peace,
SWIFT:thumb_yello:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

I personally had a flag thrown up in my mind when he mentioned it was good to invest in the stock market. I admire DW for his thoughts and how they fit in my life's paradigm, but to say that it's still good to invest in the stock market is a bit hard to swallow.

In Peace and Unity,
Roman:eek::sorry:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

I have to filter between wilcock the man and wilcock the information, in this interview i didnt really get the whole jazz blurb but then the interviewer was the one asking the questions so i guess david obliged (a lot!). I also agree with the dangers of the same 'gang' of people in that it could well become an information cul-de-sac. I would really like to see some new hard hitting stuff like the 2012 Enigma doc, now that was a thrill!

PS Thanks to all posters for their considered responses, i was worried it would develop into an all out wilcock bashing! We can disagree without becoming abusive and thats why i come here. :original:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Spot on feardia ! ... I've said this also a couple of times. And you name exactly those who I had in mind too ...:thumb_yello:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

I agree to a degree....Can we list folks for the new comers that AREN'T falling down the rabbit hole???

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Bob Dean is the only half believable one out of the bunch you mention, but if you've heard him once you've heard just about all he has to say. I have of late begun to have some doubts about him as I think there is some credence to the 'Victor' claims but my jury is still out. (shutters)

The rest easily fit into your 'guru and false prophet' classification.
Wilcock thinks 'googling' things and printing them out is actual research.
Fulford's bizzare claims and predictions have all been no-shows. (correct me if I'm wrong)
Deagle is a disgraced former doctor who has been struck from the medical register in Colorado.
Bursich is a total fraud of near epic proportions who was exposed by UFO magazine and George Knapp years ago.
Hoagland isn't a scientist even though he plays one on radio shows who used Google Master Wilcock as a research assistant.
Greer, whose original Disclosure Project got numerous people to expose themselves and violate their security oaths has gone 'native' and become enchanted by invisible aliens apparently only he (because of his superior evolved consciousness) can see.

At some point you would hope that people would tire of the faux-reality fantasies and discard the hoaxers and con-men that are so prevalent in Ufology and 'Paranormal' circles. There is some real truth to be found only sometimes you have to abandon your former false conclusions and pet 'stories' you've come to adore to accept them.

The history of Ufology is one of deception, confidence jobs, and disinformation agents (both official and free-lance) which are either attempting to eek out a buck from the rubes or prevent the truth from being realized by the public. I think the names above fall more into the 'free-lance' category although true agents like Richard Doty and William Moore must still be active in the community.

I have a feeling the truth (about the UFO phenomena) is stranger and potentially more unsettling than any of the tales the above people have dreamed up or told. But I could be wrong of course and make no claims of 'insider information' or special insight other than what my over 40 years of study on the subject has provided me.

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Thank you very much for posting this and finding the interview (for me).

I love David.. No he's not the greatest musician but he's making music from the heart and thats all that really matters IMO. The music turned out really well, so clearly he does have some talent to go along with beautiful vision. Music is supposed to be about feeling after all.


In light, of love
Shaynard

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Expression through music is an incredible thing that everyone should get the chance to feel. except through jazz!! :lmao:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Yeah, like what kind of unsettling, reptoids having us for dinner? :tongue2:

I'm interested to know if there is anyone you 'don't' consider a disinformation agent in these fields, trainedobserver...

I'm gonna bust a gut if you say Jim Sparks. :original:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

For the second time today I agree with feardia...

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

:welcomeani:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

hilarious

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

[QUOTE=feardia;232335]I have just been listening to DW, why is he talking so much about his skills as a jazz drummer? Why doesn't he just play a track and we can judge for ourselves how good he is.


David said that he has alot of "free items" on his site. Downloads I think he was referring to. I have only been there once or twice. David was selling his cd for 80.00 which I found outrageous. That is why he doesn't play it over the air. People would not buy his cds

I am not faulting him for selling his work but the cost was out of reach for some of us. I happen to love jazz but now that much !

He has something to offer us and I'm sure as Anchor says, he holds much in. Thats good ! If its not a need to know, he should hold things in especially when someone ask him to like Kerry did. Kerry seems to know way more than she lets on. When I heard her interview with Mel, I almost fell over with her knowledge.

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

very funny feardia!! could start a new craze!! go on do it :thumb_yello:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Be your own whistleblower :original:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

As my own guru, I will not follow this request.:naughty::wink2:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

I laughed. :lol3: Gone native.

I thought Greer was the more scientific of them all.

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

I don't place a lot of weight on tales of 'reptilians' or 'reptoids' myself.

And I think I've miscommunicated. I don't think any of the people listed are actual governmental 'disinformation' agents. The only two I know of for sure worked for the government, since they confessed, is Richard Doty and William Moore. With the exception of Dean I think the rest are opportunistic con-men who don't believe a thing they are saying mixed in with some who are misinformed and deluded who cannot differentiate between fantasy and reality. While there is a documented history of government infiltration and control of UFO study groups and the dissemination of misinformation and disinformation by them at this point in time I don't think it is any longer necessary. Why should they bother? The UFO community readily embraces proven frauds and hoaxers with open arms and fails to give alleged informants and whistle blowers the scrutiny one would give someone trying to sell you a used car!

While Jim Sparks has an interesting story and I've listened to him tell it several times, I have never read his book. I do think a great deal of his story matches up with other abductee/experiencers unlike say the Rutter/Reed story for example. But that really doesn't mean anything. Practically all elements of his story existed elsewhere beforehand. I don't by any means take what any abductee/experiencer/contactee says at face value but I think they are worth listening to and considering especially when patterns are evident.

Who do I think are giving honest efforts even though I may not agree with them on all points? Richard Dolan, Stanton Friedman, David Jacobs, Karla Turner, John Mack, Jacques Vallee ...and there are many others.

Good books I'd recommend.

• UFOs and the National Security State: Chronology of a Coverup, 1941-1973 by Richard M. Dolan
• UFOs and the National Security State: The Cover-Up Exposed, 1973-1991 by Richard M. Dolan
• Messengers of Deception: UFO Contacts and Cults by Jacques Vallee
• REVELATIONS: Alien Contact and Human Deception by Jacques Vallee
• CONFRONTATIONS: A Scientists Search for Alien Contact by Jacques Vallee
• DIMENSIONS: A Casebook of Alien Contact by Jacques Vallee
• UFOs, the Secret History: by Michael Hesemann

"Yeah, like what kind of unsettling ..." The kind of unsettling that causes whoever encounters the real truth to agree that it should never be told to the public. The kind of unsettling that says everything you think you know is framed by an invisible incomprehensible truth you cannot readily perceive and may never fully realize. It is the kind of unsettling that causes the mind to retreat, reject, and obfuscate the truth from even itself. Weirdness and strangeness of the highest order. ...or something like that.

The badly written science fiction that many of the alleged whistle blowers peddle is actually recycled B-Movies and T.V. science fiction plots. I surprised more people don't call them on it.

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Greer claims to 'vector' in UFOs like the Prophet Yahweh and once published photos on his website of insects and light reflections claiming they were pictures of UFOs. Any scientific detachment he may have possessed at one time seems to have vanished.

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Sounds like quite the elite group there, but other than selling books, attending conferences, doing interviews, and "scrutinizing" others in the same field, there is nothing that differentiates these people from the same argument you're making against the others like Wilcock, Greer, etc...

Matter of fact, if anyone is a disinfo agent, it could easily be argued and counter pointed that those same set of characters you mentioned above are the actual agents. Most or all of them have worked for the government, Friedman openly gloats about the number of places he's worked on classified projects, Vallee was involved with DARPA, Jacobs is a Uni-folk man pushing the 'alien threat' agenda with research only into any cases that involve a 'threatening' experience, and Dolan; while I think hes great and his book National Security State vol.1 is most certainly noteworthy, he himself has also been involved with Camelot and aligned with the same people you implicate are pushing disinformation.

Let me just say that I fully understand your appeal to credibility and totally relate, but there are two sides to every coin, and there isn't a post on the world wide web that can simplify and generalize the complex issues we face and continue to face on the ufology front. Not even ufowatchdog, who seem to think the world operates only in black or white.

My opinion is there has been evidence for multiple phenomena within the framework of 'ufos', the problem is every person wants his/her 'one explanation' for the entire phenomenon to be the right one. Vallee and Hynek explain it as interdimensional, Friedman is a classic Roswell proponent/greys-occupy-saucers from zeti reticuli, and then you have the Hopkins and similar mindsets focusing only on abductions. I'm no fan of Dan Burisch and never have been, but what makes his time-traveler explanation any less plausible than those with other theories.

Even the people who seem to possess the most honesty and credibility can hardly agree on anything, does that mean some or all of them are disinfo agents.

One thing I do agree with you, is a lot of people are indeed seeking attention, their fifteen minutes of fame, and they do want to make money off this, there a lot of deluded people and I am in no way denying 'that part' of what you're saying. But strictly in the context disinformation, Vallee or Friedman could easily be disinformation, and keep in mind that good people are often compromised, I happen to think this was the case with Greer after his disclosure project didn't quite make the headlines he was hoping for, and then he got older and started to think of just himself.

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Great post Majorion!!

I have a question for everyone:

When the EGO is involved...what does honesty and credibility have to do with anything??

We are all human and warped by the white hot spotlight....Peace

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Right on Trainedobserver, your telling it like is!

Personally, I like guys like Colin Andrews, Patrick Heron, Tom Horn
Lloyd Pie, WB Stewart and others, who actually do their own research

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

You cant write a song thats never been sung :trumpet:

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

I'd have to question how familiar you actually are with those people's work, Richard Dolan in particular. Have you read his two books? If there were only two books on the UFO phenomena you ever read, they would be the ones to read. The guy does actual research.

You would undoubtedly suspect that I am a agent from my background. I certainly am not nor do I think those men are. They seldom make claims that they cannot back up with copious notes, references, and actual hands on research. However, this gets back to something I said earlier. It seems the truth about the phenomena is so bizarre, terrible, or strange that those who are let in on it may change their opinions on disclosure and may actually agree to contribute to its obfuscation for purely moral reasons. So it is possible a serious researcher could acquire information that changes his mode from one of exposure to protection. I don't think that is the case here however but I could be wrong. (I was once wrong in 1976 for several minutes so I know it is possible :) JOKE ... that was a JOKE) I fully recognize my ability to be completely mistaken.


I think Jacob's just reports what is coming to him. His conclusions are logical based on the data he is getting.

I was a bit taken back by this also initially until I heard his explanation. Dolan has stated he will talk to anyone, anywhere, to promote the sales of his books. While some people will look down their nose at him for this he is just doing good business by getting his books out there in the demographic that would be interested in them. Promoting books is just another part of writing books unless you are a trust-fund baby or something. Dolan is a voice of reason.

I think if you'll examine what these guys actually say is they all confess to not being entirely sure about the origins of the phenomena themselves. The major line of demarcation appears to be between folks who think they are nuts and bolts machines and those who think they are living beings themselves. Certainly anyone studying the phenomena for any length of time will recognize and understand that it is not monolithic.

I love to hate Dan Burisch like I love to hate a good movie villain. He is simultaneously comical and dastardly. For years now he has proposed the most ridiculous and amateurishly presented stories as his real experience. The story has evolved and changed so many times and each new chapter is more goofy than the previous one. His new wife posted some rather scary and particularly revealing videos as a message to his former wife on her youtube channel. I think if you listen to those you'll get a real good feeling for the mental atmosphere surrounding those two. I would love for someone to do some investigative work and film Dan and Marcie at their regular jobs and post them. It would be interesting to see what their real jobs are don't you think? My point being these are confidence operators. The man's most audacious lie has to be that he would be part of MJ-12. Just look at the list of accomplished individuals on the 'alleged' list and then carefully consider if Burisch is in their league. It is absolutely hilarious that this former parole officer would in any way qualify to be in that company of people.


Well if they are lying about who they are and what they have done then they are simply liars. Burisch, IMHO, is just an opportunistic liar. He is running the 'paranormal' con-game. It could have been anything he just choose that scam.

Just what would Vallee and Friedman be saying that is 'disinformation'? Just a couple of talking points would do. Have you read Vallee's books? I have. He is very non-committal about the whole thing. Yes, he has an opinion based on years of real research. But he would tell you it is just that, his opinion.

I think Greer was enchanted and enticed by the 'woo-woo' side of things much like Gilliand. He may have been bought, brainwashed, or just deceived I do not know but something happened to that guy. Time will tell.

When looking at any of these people you have to ask the basic questions. Who are they? (How many times have they changed their names?)
What is their background? Do they have the qualifications to make the statements they are making? What is their educational background? Are they lying about themselves or their experience?

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Woah! Hello Raleigh! I used to live there and worked for the defunked Data General down in Cary.

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

I am very familiar with the research done by Dolan, Friedman, and Vallee. I admit that I never got to vol.2 of security state, but a friend loaned me vol.1 and I got the jist of it before he snatched it off me again. Vallee, I read one of his books long ago, Messengers of Deception. And Friedman has done some good research on Majestic and a lot of other cross correlating documents, at least before he came out with Flying Saucers and Science which was not really his best work, simply put he is the strongest proponent of the Betty and Barney Hill case and 'the father of Roswell', no shortage of targets he's had either, he jumped on Bob Lazar and the late Col. Corso and who knows else, check his website, its all on the front page.

I don't know what you're background is and I do not presume to know who you are in real life, but your posts often reflect dissent, which IMO is a very suspicious trait. But no, do I think you're a disinfo agent trainedobserver? no absolutely not.

This is to maintain the illusion of credibility in a field already filled with deluded minds where the competition can be about honesty and authority. Most people who side with Friedman and those types are often appealing to authority.

His conclusions are far from logical, I'm surprised you're not writing a whole essay critique of the guy. :original:

A voice of reason among the many charlatans.

Was only pointing out, that despite his extremely questionable and often ridiculous character, his explanation about ufos representing time travellers could ultimately be just as plausible as any of the other theories, again, despite his character. This is a very important point I want to stress.

In this hypothetical context, neither need say anything dishonest or fraudulent to be a disinformation agent, only to be a major figure and with tremendous influence within the ufo circles. If somebody has enough influence within a community, and widely perceived as a 'voice of reason', then you can understand how easy it would be to direct the masses in any given direction or agenda. Again, nobody has to tell even one lie for an agenda to be carried out, and in this case, God knows how many charlatans there are in ufology, this makes the job so incredibly easy.

The fact that so many trust Friedman so wholeheartedly without ever questioning his motives, is enough to conclude something suspicious.

For the record, I am 'big time' opposed to Greer as an 'individual', but his Disclosure Project was/is/remains bigger and a better accomplishment than any other figure in all of ufology. Everybody else, in comparison, is just selling an opinion or a book or a documentary.

Its very easy to pick out the obvious charlatans, but when we're talking about Vallee and Friedman, I never hear or see skeptics looking into their backgrounds, never. I would like to see the same measures applied to every figure in ufology, and I would like to see their motives questioned just as rigorously.

Re: New Wilcock Interview
 

Now I find that extremely funny. You find dissent, and by that I think you are talking about my skepticism, suspicious? If you are into this subject and you do not maintain a healthy skepticism you're subject to believe any and everything without a lot critical analysis. Skepticism is a valuable tool in the search for truth.

Friedman is an educated man who investigates and documents what he is doing. I really cannot argue with that. But there again, if you have heard Friedman speak once you've pretty much heard all he has to say.

Maybe you could elaborate on that point a bit. How do you find his conclusions illogical? His conclusions, if I am not mistaken, are that there is a long-standing program or experiment being performed using the human race as biological resource material. This pretty much fits with the rest of the abduction research. Personally ...I do not know and do not understand how we could possibly "know" whether this is the truth. I think the evidence supports that notion that the aliens (or whoever they are) don't really feel a overwhelming need to tell us the truth about who they are, where they are from, or what they are actually doing here.

The fact remains that there are those out there honestly seeking the truth about the phenomena and there are those who plainly are not for whatever reason.

One other thing, you do know of course that Bursich is not the originator of the time travel scenario and that he, like Wilcock, takes bits from the overall 'buzz' and applies it to his storyline. I personally don't put a lot of weight into time travel stories for the common reasons most people give. It seems more likely to me that we are dealing with non-human and human species that come from other planets (if these planets exist in other dimensions seems a moot point to me) who appear to have long established bases of operation on this planet. I don't know for sure and have accepted the fact that I probably never will.