Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

Oh I've watched St Clair....I don't agree with him and don't get a good feeling but I still take it all in. I can't stand from a lofty perch and say this person can be heard but not that one. I'm sorry when you form a site like this you sign up for a few things....the first being when folks come to express themselves...They own the site ...not the one paying for the domain name. It grows into something more...or something less. Would it have been so bad just to stay above it all and not post "This guy isn't our friend anymore...or this one" Just to leave it alone and it would relegate itself to where it needs to be....or rise to what it should.

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

You're right that the site is shaped by the members. It's Bill and Kerry's site, but the members set the tone and bring the major content.

I do have an opinion about all this, not that it matters. I said in an earlier post that I thought the removal of St Clair's interviews was ill advised, and I still feel that way. But at the same time I totally support Bill and Kerry's right to determine what content Camelot will contain.

It's a fact that St Clair has been making comments about Bill being this or that instrument of the PTB. I know Bill and know that's not true. Yet Bill said nothing for months, even though I'm sure he was aware of it. St Clair didn't say anything derogatory about Kerry until after his material had been removed, and then it was that maybe SHE was Bill's handler, instead of the other way around, as he'd previously said. That was Callous and hurtful. Bill and Kerry haven't said anything callous or hurtful in return. They just simply decided to stop making Michaels materials available on their site, with a simple note as to why. It's their right to present whatever material they want.

I personally think Michaels material should stay, as it's useful, and I'm sure at least some members came here primarily for Michaels interviews and earlier interaction on the forum.

It's also kind of unfortunate that when Michael established his own forum, he stopped participating on this one.

It is what it is, and I don't see it changing, so perhaps it's best to just leave Bill and Kerry with their decision, and enjoy the rest of their FREE content on Camelot, and enjoy the interesting interactions available here on the forum.

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

I just thought about something. When Billy Graham's organization had a problem with a bill, individual, organization, or company...it is my understanding, at least, that they paid whatever was owed(or claimed to be owed)...and just simply stopped doing business with that individual, organization, or company. No fighting. No comment. Nothing. They simply went quietly in another direction. There may be some real wisdom in that. No comment. No fighting. No invitations. No interviews. Nothing. It's very easy to second guess and criticize when one is not directly involved in a situation. However...just as a hypothetical...what if something like this happens again...and the previously posted interviews are left alone...but no further contact or comment is made regarding the problem individual? Both parties might just move on...without stirring up a hornets nest.

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

orthodoxymoron, what you are suggesting is called co-existing peacefully. Great idea.

Now that K&B retracted their endorsement of St. Clair, I am left to wonder which part of St. Clair's past interviews I should re-evaluate.

-feeler

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

This subject has now been debated to death......can we just bury the hatchet now and move on pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee.:naughty:

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

As an interesting side note to all of this...St. Clair has just today posted links for two Camelot presentations/interviews on his Facebook page. I do not know if he maintains his own Facebook page, but I thought it a bit strange to see them posted by him. Is he trying to "say he is sorry?"

Just a weird thing I noticed. I had a "hmmm" reaction to it

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

:mf_popeanim::dead thread?

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

:rip_1:

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

This is a tragic love story right?

The intuition I get from this whole scenario is that St Clair has/had romantic feelings for Kerry and viewed Bill as an obstacle or competition.

This was gleaned from body language and other things I picked up..

I may be totally wrong but please dont attack me if you disagree.

The people here saying nasty things about St Clair and 'I disliked him from the start' etc how would you feel about people being so quick to judge you.

Zen of Stars is a great book, at least he did something positive we can agree on (if you even read it that is).

Peace out,

L

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

:original:

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

Luminari,

Are you serious?

Do you know whether Kerry was ever invited to join St. Clair's Radiant Zone?

If I were Bill, being human, besides erasing St. Clair's interviews from this site, I would try to erase St. Clair from Kerry's memory.

Just kidding.:naughty:

-feeler

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

Sarah, I have been falsley accused of worse. Why do you think, if indeed you do, I come out so strongly against this type of behaviour? May I suggest a measure of introspection before you attack. May I also suggest you read my post carefully and understand what I was saying.

Just in case you are wondering my humiliation was VERY public and a LOT worse than being called a "handler".

Love to You too............

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

Let's just have compassion for Bill and Kerry's situation here, and now move on as they would wish.

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

What a novel concept (Yes I wish everyone would move on) its not going to change anything by keeping this thread going. Peace to all.

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

I have to agree. Bill and Kerry seem done with any public dealings on this, and Michael St Clair is continuing with his denigrating insinuations a few times a day. Let him. It's his Karma.

Nothing to be gained by continuing to focus attention on this unfortunate blip in the road. The only thing we ultimately control is our part of the creation of any of this.

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

.....................end they lived happily ever after...........................


THE END

Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb
 

Yea.....finally. Over & out. have a wonderful day.:mfr_lol: