![]() |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Dear HAveBlue
Quote:
noone on this thread is slagging anyone off..if you wanna go public, you ought to be open to public scrutiny, it's never a one way thing...same applies to mr wilcock..not a great idea to form personalities cults, i think.. best wishes |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Hi Have,
thank you very much for your constructive contribution. Sorry for having insulted your Guru-mentality. |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Quote:
Whenever i was able to perthink one of these chicks to join me and we went off to hone into David’s time-space coordinates, they gave me the same thought: ”Oh no dude, wrong timeline!” and ZAPP! and they were back into the Multiverse. :sad: |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Quote:
|
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Quote:
43 yr old women are HOT!! |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Quote:
|
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Quote:
... and the decoy statement does not invalidate my point *in fact it proves it*- which was that people gain expertise in other areas of life than just the work (job) environment... and that you don't need a diploma or a college degree to KNOW what you KNOW ( have lived out in experience)... now that i have re-read the thing- as suggested by Anchor in the following posts... HJ... what is so wrong with one expert critiquing another expert? Isn't that what we are here for? |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Quote:
Woah there - that is not what HJ is saying at all - if anyone should be upset it would be trainedobserver who he has accused of trolling you and not you trolling anyone! Read it again :) A.. |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Quote:
A.. |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Quote:
Quote:
One thing no one seems to address either is the face in the building of the daytime youtube video of the tetrahedron ufo. I mean, look at it. There's a friggin guy superimposed over that skyscraper. The daytime video is definitely fake. In fact it's so fake that it's ridiculous for it to even be in the ebook. He never says the daytime video is legit, but he doesn't point out the obvious that there is a man superimposed over one of the buildings. Does that invalidate the nighttime UFO video? Not necessarily, but still, addressing something so obvious would be nice if you're going to go to the trouble of including it at all. |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Yes, this thread was seriously off track. That’s partially my fault. So, its good to be back.
Quote:
The scripts are obviously written by Humans without any background relating to Aliens. So they use the Alien appeal to get more audience. You can substitute Alien for boat people from Myanmar and the story would not change. Let me try on that low ALIEN NATION level: The Reptilians are getting high on KOH. So the Human government would highly tax Draino, with exemptions for Humans. I would star by busting a Draino- black-market gang and would help with the impounded Potassium-hydroxide to unblock a poor community’s sewer… Spare me that D9: You can substitute Alien for boat people from Myanmar and the story would not change. Its about South Africa’s discrimination and exploitation. In both films the Aliens are in a predicament and had to rely on Humans. Also the governments are hospitable. In these two aspects the films are real fiction. No half-sane Alien society would willingly expose themselves in that way to the influence of Human society. They will not accept to be downgraded by getting sucked into this mainstream nightmare of greed, power and violence. My guess is, that they would set up a completely isolated enclave, which would operate independent of any input from Human society. Protected by high tech gadgets they might invite certain people for education/exchange in ethics, history, arts etc. (Me first!) They might NOT be willing to educate in science and religion. That would be a good start. |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Where is the "frigging guy"?
|
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Quote:
|
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
I think its a trick of the mind. I didnt see it until i "knew" where and what to look for.
|
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
I just stumbled upon this:
Daniel Solis claims that HAARP has deleted all its records for the Haiti earthquake date. He asks to check by yourself by simply entering the quake date into HAARPs own data search engine. Then he is ranting about it being proof that the public is been misled about the HAARP connection to the Norway spiral. He concluded his article with: “ This is how the public is being constantly misled on everything.” Solis is correct: If you enter the date he has suggested, then HAARP will refer to an old database which is not any more accessible. The only problem is: The date he is suggesting is the 11th January 2001, and not 2010 ! The data for 2010 is of course not deleted. This is how a conjecture gets amplified . link http://thepowerhour.com/news4/haarp_deleted_records.htm . |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Quote:
|
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
I notified them more than 2 weeks ago, and the article is still up.
That`s the internet...:tears: |
43 !
Quote:
a. |
Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
The article is still up, more than 2 months of disinfo. Well done...
Anne: Thanks for editing. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon