Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

I don't feel sorry for your not being able to tell the right leg of the person, through photoshopping, has been shortened, rounded, and blurred at the end. -feeler




http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/7-69...tor-s-full.jpg

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

There are more people putting up on the internet fake photos of aliens than alpha-bet agencies taking them out of photo's. The fact that you can't tell which way a little old lady is facing shows how important it is to really Think about what is being said and then testing the science behind it. Your supposition dosen't hold up, and it has no validity to your claim. For all anyone knows the photo is from a plane crash somewhere else.

You are hell bent on it being holograms, there for any evidence to the contrary is false, this is not science or seeking the truth, it is a witch hunt. Feeler I implore you to just seek truth and let it guide your path. I have stated that something is not right with the WTC collaps, but logic says the true answers haven't been disclosed yet.

Be at peace

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

The woman has her back to us, why would you expect to see her foot when it has been foreshortened?

I would not place any faith on your perceptual abilities if you cannot discern the front or backside of a person.

Might you be the misdirection artist?

That's a compliment coming from you and of course it's innuendo, unless you regard anyone else who challenges your arguments as a shill. I would not even credit you with misdirection in the above case because I sincerely think that you believe your own BS. Instead of trying to assassinate my character which works against you btw, why don't you come up with another line of tact, like say a worthy argument?

Getting emotional isn't any way to form an objective viewpoint.

Be careful in whom you believe, verify everything.

You haven't provided any conclusive information as to holographic planes, nor have you demonstrated that your perceptual abilities are on par with even the casual observer.

Why don't you work on some basic social skills if you want to continue fighting for justice?

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing? documentary
 

hello, for all who are interested, check out my new 5 part documentary called the hologram conspiracy on youtube

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_lis...D9B4C6547CD073

enjoy!

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

Cool stuff indakaz.
My question is why do people suppose that they would ever understand the tech being used by the "Elite". Would not a smart dictator use tech that people could not comprehend? Circumstantial evidence would suggest that holograms is the answer. It would fit the inconsistencies, mssing planes, different planes, lack of wrekage, tampering with different news media and being engulfed in the towers.

I personally have had experiences seeing morphing technology and it is a wonder to see. I saw a fireball turn into three star lights and inpersonate a flying plane. We are hypnotized and live in a matrix. I suspect the law to have all tv's high definition quality is to increase this HARMonization.

Godspeed

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing? documentary
 

Could you provide a brief synopsis or outline of the documentary?

Thanks.

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing? documentary
 

Indakaz; Hi, that is great you raised a lot of good questions, What was your take on John Lears prediction that the hologram invasion would be fall us before the elections? do you think CNN did this to open us up to the idea of holograms or is it something more?

I would like to make this clear I started this thread to learn more about the subject because it is still clouded in smoke and mirrors. I don't want anyone to think I am calling John Lear a liar, I don't know him from Joe the plumber, I don't know if he is getting disinformation and sees it a credible. So I wished to start a discussion on the topic to raise my understanding of these events with the vast knowlege base that is Avalon. Feeler I am not saying you are wrong I am saying it is foolish to look at one photo and discribe the entire world from it.

Thank you Dataeast...

peace be with you

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

Did I ever state the person was facing the camera? Quote please. Hint: Why did I even bother to use the term "right" in "missing right foot" in my questioning?

Do not avoid my prior point: "...your not being able to tell the right leg of the person, through photoshopping, has been shortened, rounded, and blurred at the end." -feeler



http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/7-69...tor-s-full.jpg

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

Sorry, it looks like an old person standing on old stubby legs to me, shadows and all. I didn't claim to have any answers, in fact I claimed to not have enouph. You can print this picture everywhere it still does not address the issue, it does point out that something is wrong. Which I think was my point from the beginning. Do I think the answer lies in the fussy end of some womans leg? well that will have to be argued by someone a whole lot smarter than I.

You claim to see it, ok. What sort of camera was used?
What lens?
What light setting?
What film/ digital/chemical?

I do know a little about photography and what you call photo shop mistakes can be reproduced by many tricks of light/ angle of veiw/ and combinations there in. Without the original pic in hand for study you are standing on a limb that all you can do is point to and say " this looks wrong to me, what do all of you think?"

Where is the original? Can it be found for comparison? yes some times I am stubborn on insiting that real hard evidence be found.

I will tell you what else bothers me about that pic, the person who took it made sure he owns it " Charles Marsh" If that pic has been doctored then it leads straight back to him. Who is he and does he stand by the photo here on the net?

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

I hear the same message from the shills again and again: "DON'T BELIEVE YOUR LYING EYES! LET SOMEONE SMARTER DO IT FOR YOU!"

Quote:

Originally Posted by samncheese (Post 74110) You claim to see it, ok. What sort of camera was used? What lens? What light setting? What film/ digital/chemical?

If so much "relevant" information of the photo is missing/unknown to the public, why is this photo being used as evidence to convince the public that real planes were used to bury themselves into the towers? -feeler

Photo: MISSING FOOT

http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/7-69...tor-s-full.jpg

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

Feeler that is a good question...Why this pic?

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

found this very interesting:http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframes;read=91920[/URL]

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

Nobody but yourself has claimed that the image is fraudulent, so the onus is upon you to prove it, else it remains just a claim or opinion.

EDIT:

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/112/2...d1e30b2bde.jpg

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

Photo: MISSING FOOT

http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/7-69...tor-s-full.jpg

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

This reminds me of that drawing of the old woman and if you sqwinted your eyes another way it was a young woman.

I am sorry Feeler I don't see anything wrong with the picture itself, but I will keep an open mind about it. I have been searching for the originator of it to see if we can find out who exactly took it, but that may take some time.

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

I've never seen a more contrived image of a proof: an engine standing in an upright position with the "MURRAY" street sign in front of it. Is this an exhibit or something?



-feeler


http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/6310...12271-full.jpg

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

Wow, a close up of it too, The only thing this proves is your stuck in your own reality...

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

Proof of real planes.

:roll1:


My reality is not the one created by Philip Zelikow; that's for sure.

http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/Airc...tswtc-full.jpg

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

That is so clear thank you for patience with me.

Be at peace

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

You are welcome. Enjoy the exhibit photos.



-feeler

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

How do we explain the plane/holograph not having a shadow?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0ROZEt0ugw

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

Hi magamud: very compelling.

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

Howdy Sam,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqEpuTGc98s

I really like this guys take on it and his series. Showing media tampering, coordinated camera shots, nose in nose out evidence, missing planes, inconsistencies, planned scripts, planted witnesses, cuts in tape. This whole event was a military exercise in the Sci Fi extreme. God help us all.

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE3hvucKsRM
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovB-Mrwn0fY
Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocgm_a22l00

Inconsistencies with plane trajectory. Different shaded planes, edited tape, edit audio, different backgrounds, different broadcasts from live to evening news. Missing planes, planted evidence of debris, inconsistent plane reports, demolishion of towers, coordinated planted media reports, withholding video evidence, numerous witnesses working with the media establshiment.

How could one not think there is a possibility of holographic planes and shut the door to it?

This is the guys homesite i believe, great info and good luck!
http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
 

One of the guys project camelot interviewed said that this engine and some other stuff was planted there but that they did a huge mistake and used the wrong kind of engine... But there are not many people who know enough about engines to be able to tell.