Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

High makes some very good points. Project Camelot's support of previously discredited people like Dan Burisch is an excellent example of what he is getting at in the article. Their total lack of fact checking is also painfully evident in things like their falling for the premise of the movie Fourth Kind which was a total fabrication.

I have always viewed Project Camelot as largely a faux-reality show and I have my reasons for doing so. That is to say it is a collection of disinformation agents, hoaxers, confidence men, and delusional individuals, along with the rare genuine article in here and there I think, pretty much by chance.

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

Well if Cliff has "been around" longer than Camelot, then where's his forum, where are his whistleblowers, where's his conferences, where's his groundcrew?

Capitalizing may have nothing to do with money, in this case, Cliff is pulling people in his direction by dissing PC. Not very honorable is it?

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

My God man, then why are you even here on this forum?

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

"...the rare genuine article ... here and there ..."

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

I really like George Ure, and by inference Cliff High. I've heard him interviewed a few times and liked what I heard. The idea that we can predict the future, if in an albeit flaky way is incredibly exciting.

But when I step outside for a moment and consider that thought:

Do we really believe there is a way to predict the future?

I mean, really?

Really, really, really, really? For sure? 100%? You believe that?

Not totally surprising if then, the first thing you accurately predict with your machine would be the end of the human race - because what would be the point of having one ? Doesn't it rather eliminate the whole free will argument?


I read Cliff's site the other night, and I almost got depressed. He's building an unsinkable boat. The man with the time machine... is building an unsinkable boat, and waves 1km high will sweep the earth.

If I really believe that, I need to build an unsinkable boat too. I haven't started one yet, and I worried that I hadn't :tears: What if he IS RIGHT?? I thought. What about my living in the moment, and loving everyone, and joining the universal consciousnees and overcoming duality? These are my contingency plans. So what about my B****y unsinkable boat??

I realised then, that it's true - a man can't serve two masters and I don't think it's possible for me to plan for two outcomes... spiritual advancement whilst planning for a global killer. Preparing for a 'Global killer' means buying into fear. That's what I've learned after 18months at Avalon. I guess we just have to choose which eventuality we want to prepare for.

Who can say with 100% certainty that either spiritual ascension or giant wave sloshing will happen by 2012? For all we know, nothing will have happened.

Life has never proved me right so far, why should it start now?

Summer of Hell anyone?

K

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

I sent Clif's musings to Dr. Anderson and asked him what he would say in response - have not heard back from him yet but here's a chart from his site:

http://www.andersoninstitute.com/tim...chnologies.htm

Interesting site:
http://www.time-travelers.org/

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

Future Extrapolations based upon the past and present seem reasonable. Voyages into the past via the Akashic Records and Holographic Projections of past events may make it appear that one has time traveled. But from a non-scientific, non-ET, non-guru point of view...I am becoming increasingly skeptical regarding time travel. I really don't believe that we are being visited by Future Humans from 49,000 A.D. One more thing...absolute foreknowledge and freedom cannot peacefully coexist. Sometimes I think we live in an Insane Asylum and that the worst inmates are in charge. (Both Human and Non-Human) The Secret Government isn't holding press conferences...complete with truckloads of documents and photographs...revealing the Secrets of the Universe. So we have to do the best we can. Just listen to everyone and everything...and look for verifications and commonalities. A whistleblower with the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...probably wouldn't survive the introduction at a conference or in an interview. Classified and Secret should mean something. The real deals have very short leashes...and masters with very big sticks. If I had inside information (which I don't)...I wouldn't do interviews. I wouldn't even post on the internet. I would very carefully feed information to people who were in a position to make a difference. I'd be sort of a Cosmic Deep Throat.

:nono:Namaste:nono:

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

response to kulas post, not sure where the quote box went

I read Cliff's site the other night, and I almost got depressed. He's building an unsinkable boat. The man with the time machine... is building an unsinkable boat, and waves 1km high will sweep the earth.

If I really believe that, I need to build an unsinkable boat too. I haven't started one yet, and I worried that I hadn't :tears: What if he IS RIGHT?? I thought. What about my living in the moment, and loving everyone, and joining the universal consciousnees and overcoming duality? These are my contingency plans. So what about my B****y unsinkable boat??

I realised then, that it's true - a man can't serve two masters and I don't think it's possible for me to plan for two outcomes... spiritual advancement whilst planning for a global killer. Preparing for a 'Global killer' means buying into fear. That's what I've learned after 18months at Avalon. I guess we just have to choose which eventuality we want to prepare for.

Who can say with 100% certainty that either spiritual ascension or giant wave sloshing will happen by 2012? For all we know, nothing will have happened.

Life has never proved me right so far, why should it start now?

Summer of Hell anyone?

K[/QUOTE]

Hey Kula i got an old canoe you can patch up, very cheap :lol3:

enjoying your posts

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

I agree totally. I thank B&K for this site but I no longer access Camelot. Too much hooey to take seriously.

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

I'm saying the discussion has always been on the facts. Saying that Cliff is trying to discredit this person or steal this person's thunder is just a diversion. This isn't about loyalty. It's about finding out what is real. IMO, Cliff has gotten much more notoriety for some of his predictions that he has called.

--sjkted

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

That's not what Cliff does. Cliff's angle is to do linguistic analysis to predict events that may happen in the future. That's his primary source of information. He then correlates the linguistic details with news reports to gain precision of current events and the future.

As far as groundcrew, I'm not sure what you are insinuating. If you're suggesting that all of us are just blind sheep that follow B&K, you can count me out. I may stick around and post every once in a while, but I'm the only person I follow.

--sjkted

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

I second this view. B&K get quite a bit of garbage information thrown their way. Many of the whistleblowers B&K interview are just relaying information that they have been given. They are genuine and real and they are not lying, but most of them aren't really qualified to substantiate whether their information is real either. That's why we need people like Cliff and that's why we need to research these people's backgrounds and the topic matter as much as we can.

I'm here because the people are here real and yet awakened to what is happening in the world. Most of the whistleblowers live in a world of government protocols and systems. They aren't real. We are.

--sjkted

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

Hey, what's wrong with a little preparation? I'm ready to go exodus style to my high-altitude cave in Arizona with my items should the need (pole shift) arise.

I'm also doing quite well in spiritual prep work.

IMO, it's impossible for anyone to know what really will happen. It's very prudent to have preparations for any scenario. Then again, if the full pole shift 2012-movie style happens, I'm not sure I would want to stay incarnated on this planet. It's one thing to make it alive through. It's another to think of how horrific life could be afterwards...

--sjkted

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

I've listened to Cliff High before, but personally, I don't need anyone to tell me whose qualified and whose lying, and whose a fraud, etc. These are distinctions best left to people's own intuitions and research, because ultimately that's the way things have always been and people will follow whatever they want anyway.

Suggesting a 'need' for some third party analysis when people can do their own analysis and come to their own conclusions, is absurd.

Peace

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

If anyone needs to know what's real, here's a tip.

Just turn off this computer and sit still for three minutes.

There you go, there you are. It's you. Weclome. Is that real enough for you?

Real is happening now. It's only happening now. It doesn't come tomorrow.

If you are preparing right now for a 1000m wall of water heading for your house. Then that is your reality.

There's nothing wrong with that reality. But I don't feel like it's me. I'm not good with 1000m of water. Doesn't seem that I was born to deal with that amount of free universal hand-out.

So I'm going to try and stick to what I know. I'm just watching Greg Braden's 7 parter on youtube... and I have to say I feel a lot better watching that than reading up on boats. Maybe I'm deluded, Cliff talks about the one's who deal with fear , rather than threats.

But here's the kicker... WE ALL DIE.

Sometime.

What are you doing to prepare for that inevitable event? Got enough paper and glue? Bought enough dried food for that one?

What is real is what is real to you. And we are all one. There is no right or objective wrong, only your perfect expression of the collective atoms that is you. How could you fo anything, but what you were born for?

Love yas

K

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

i agree 100% with what you wrote.

and cliff has articulated my problem with PC, glad to see a lot of folks see the sense in what he wrote.

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

:smoke: opened quite a can of worms here it seems. i agree with cliff about whistleblowers. i just thought he didnt need to get so tetchy an miffed about it by openly binning camelot again. i mean when i heard the atlantean synthetic beings coming through a star gate in the gulf of aden im like:nono: sounds a bit sily lol.

i think cliff is also correct that as the mass awakening takes place the disinfo is going to be coming thick and fast with people hungry to go down the endless rabbit holes, as i was and bill and kerry need to be extra careful from here on in with information..:original:


also caught an interveiw with deagle and texx marrs with excellent info on the twoings and froings of the obama administration round the world. then deagle brings up planet x out of the blue.. seems people just need fillers for thier radio shows these days.. clark kent !! im with you lol.

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

roger that :thumb_yello:

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

could only manage 30 secs here :lmao:

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

As you know, much of the issues we are looking at are very complex. I'm not sure about you, but I'm not an expert in physics, chemistry, astronomy, ancient languages, religion, etc.

In many cases such as the Zacharia Stichin discussion, one needs to be a subject expert in order to weigh in a qualified decision.

The other main issue is time. I have a full time job and I would imagine other people on here do something other than Avalon full time. I do my best to investigate each of these topics, but I can't possibly cover all angles due to time constraints.

In other words, there's nothing wrong with the Cliff Notes (pun intended). :-)

Yes, we can all do our own analysis, but it will obviously be heavily biased based on our own strengths, knowledge, and weaknesses. That is, unless YOU really do know everything.

--sjkted

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

I'm sure there was a time when telling the future through badger's spleens was cutting edge. I'm sure they had their reasons why Norwegian Badger was simply the best and most accurate kind of badger around for the job.

Still , when you're the king who paid 15 Groats for the report and you're standing there with an arrow in your eye, you look kinda silly.

One thing you learn from history, is that no one ever learns from history. :original:

So why should time machines, or whistleblowers be any different, than they have been through all time.

I'm playing devil's advocate here, of course. I like Cliff and respect him. I also like Bill and Kerry, without them, there'd be no discussion (not here, anyway). I like the idea that time machine web-botting can work. But my willingness to believe in things is apt to get me into trouble. We have to look for concrete 'subjective' evidence that the universe works as we think it does.

Did Cliff have a prediction in for the 12th Jan in Haiti ?

Are Bill and Kerry writing to him and asking him why not?

Some one said, you point the finger... and three point straight back at you.

I'm trying to wave my hands around these days in opendish kinda gestures.

K

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

Is Cliff really going off on the fact that Kerry and Bill rely on one on one interaction to assess the voracity of interviewees. Silly Cliff. He should know better. I guess not.

Second, who agrees with Cliff on his stance? No one. Hey ground control calling Cliff. On looking back into this thread I see that I am wrong. Hey ground control calling all bozo's.

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

You must not live right on the beach close enough to see the waves coming and going every day. I've felt for the last few years like I'm about to be a planned refugee somewhere. I'm not sure exactly where, but I really don't see beach living being all that viable for that much longer.

What's interesting is that if you look at all of the posts from intuitives in California on Avalon, many people are repeating the same message.

I'm not 100% sold that it's an inevitability, but it never hurts to be ready.

--sjkted

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

Nor do I claim to be an expert on these things either.
However I doubt that kind of complex knowledge is required in order for one to discern a genuine individual from a possible fraud. Because I was under the impression that this is the issue expressed in this thread, correct? About some or 'all' of the PC whistleblowers? - this has nothing to do with religion, languages, astronomy, etc. And Zecharia Sitchen is a moot point... if you consider yourself inadequately capable of discerning Sitchen's work using your own common sense, then that's your problem, not everyone else's.

When you say: "Yes, we can all do our own analysis, but it will obviously be heavily biased"

I ask you, and this wouldn't be the case with Cliff High as well?

So you're basically saying that we should depend on the views of Cliff High for discerning genuine honest individuals from outright liars? His opinion isn't biased, only ours?

If you don't have the time to do your own investigation, nor have the inclination, and you really find the matter so difficult, then you probably do need someone to force their opinion on you. But this isn't the case with me, and I'm sure not the case with most other people as well.

Peace

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

Well, I'm an intuitive living in California. What I've surmised over the many years is that people that don't live in California are jealous. Their states don't have the Hollywood, the Googles, the Intels, etc, etc. So they dream up stupid things like California falling into the ocean.

So the message from California somewhat agrees with the message from the above poster. Don't move to California. We already have enough people here.

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

I agree about outsiders being jealous. I've traveled to other states and I understand.

I wouldn't go that far to tell people not to move here, but we are losing population for the first time ever. There's a good reason with the state being bankrupt, the mortgage crisis, the home prices still being way overvalued, and the general business environment. This is a hard place to make it.

I'm not so sure about the earth changes being a hoax by jealous outsiders. I've seen in dreams what appears to be the area where I am living entirely engulfed in water and I have been watching for signs that this may happen. I'm not sure it's a pole shift or a massive earthquake, but either way if you look at details for the liquefaction zone and the people who are living there, we are not very well set up to handle much of anything higher than a brief 6.0 earthquake.

--sjkted

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

That's an interesting notion. See people, are people. that much we know about them, and they are liable to do peoply kind of things. Getting jealous is an artform we have developed much better than clairvoyancy so far. In fact, I'm surprised we can't take qualifications in it!

I agree with you skjted, there is no reason not to be prepared, and each must follow their own intuitions. Problem for me though is that I can't hold both kinds of preparations in my head any more. I have to choose, but that's just me, I'm not preaching here (cuh!.. or I'd have to set up my own website :original:). I bought tins. I even have a 10kg sack of rice I bought in Sep 08... That just gives me a warm feeling every night just knowing it's there. (no, it doesn't actually... no more so than a mercedes 120 Sk class would sitting on my drive.)

That cupboard has felt dead and stuck ever since I filled it with food. Most of it has probably gone off by now too. every time I look at that cupboard it reminds me of a disasterous future. One of which I have no 'guarantee' is going to arrive.

However, each time I say, 'I love you' to someone on this forum, it does fill me with warmth. Each time I say... that's great... I love what you did there...I feel good. That is real, and that is now.. and ultimately that is where my fate lies... even if that fate is only three years long :wink2:

So bless us, everyone. We have the freedom, luck and time to discuss the number of angels on the head of the pin. One of us might get close to the answer.

Do I believe that Cliff High alone has stumbled onto a rare secret of the universe. Perhaps... but maybe it can just reinvent itself tomorrow too.

Love does seem to be rather a constant, whichever way we look at things.

K:wub2:

P.S. I can see the sea from my bedroom window... and it looks beautiful if I see the sun rise over it.

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

First Off... You BETTER be in the Highlands in Arizona if we keep getting rains like this on the West Coast AND Yellowstone keeps its pattern of rumblings.
Is that Cliff's website predicting the future? Or Common Sense?
If the West Coast gets a good shake? Life and Property will be damaged.
I enjoy reading Urbn Survival.The owner of Urban like's Cliff.Do I like Cliff? I don't read or know him. I appreciate his effort though. Because of what I read from Urban.
My Point?
B and K seem genuine to me. Some of their whistleblowers? I believe a lot of portions of some of what they say.
I'm not mysticle, clairvoiant, and some of my dreams skeer me their so real.
So what?
Going into survival mode seems natural. I don't know why.
That's why I moved to Lake Tahoe. Get out of Southern California,head to high waters,hope the plume from an eruption from Yellowstone or the fricking chemtrails their spraying on me don't kill me.:mfr_omg:
NOW my 18year old daughter is moving to So. Cal...With Conan gone?
I'm worried...........:tongue2:

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

Of course not. I say be your own guru. Discern for yourself. Having other people's research to view is very helpful, but it's no substitute for fact checking and figuring it out yourself.

Of course, Cliff's opinion is biased. I mentioned earlier that he is a little imbalanced (too much intellectual and not too much spiritual).

The point I've been making here and trying to bring out is that B&K ought to be focused on a balanced message. I'm not saying don't interview Bill Deagle. I'm suggesting they act like responsible journalists ought to be and interview a number of different sources with different information and diverse areas of expertise. Facts should be checked and scrutinized.

With B&K, no facts are checked and Bill defends the whistleblower's views based on loyalty. They act as though they are building upon this "knowledge" with subsequent interviews, when in reality they are just building a house of cards with some really good, entertaining, wild stories that in many cases happen to be untrue and misleading.

If they were really looking for the truth, when they had an honest challenge from someone like Cliff on a whistleblower (Deagle's) testimony, they would be at the very least open to researching further, as opposed to just accepting Deagle's word on blind faith.

--sjkted

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

[QUOTE=TraineeHuman;226535]As far as I understand, Cliff High's whole argument that time travel doesn't exist is based on the fact that "time doesn't exist". I agree that strictly speaking, the only time that really exists is the eternal now.

Im hearing this more and more every time someone starts speaking lately.

Its hard for me to visualize this and I asked my son what he thought and his answer was "think of it as your whole life, all life times on one CD"

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

Are we living in the same Project Camelot world? Nowhere did Kerry and Bill state that they were accepting any testimony on blind faith.

If you don't think that Kerry and Bill should be doing what they are doing, then why are you here?

Cliff High? Half Past Human? Think about these names. What are the odds?

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

I think they have a balanced message purely by running the forum.

Plenty of people discuss their affairs and videos pro and con on here.

When I first came to camelot, I watched most of the vids, lapped them up. I think it was only when I got to Dan B, that my own internal radar went 'hmmm' . But I liked B & K, they seem raw, they seem earnest and , like me, not perfect.

But yes, the rabbit hole leads to a warren, and for me, it's not long before one doubt throws up ten more. It's impossible to figure out at our level (i think) what is going on at their level. So that's when I start zooming back out again. There is no objective reality to discover. Certainly not by perusing websites. How can any of us really know any of these people as well as we know ourselves? Except to the extent of knowing that if i'm not perfect...there's a good chance they can be misled about stuff too.

I still don't get Grangdons from the planet Arrghh. I'm surely showing my ignorance to the zillion people who've had ET contact. But until I have one in for coffee, I'll remain skeptical that they are channeling important info about the fate of the galaxy. I respect that other's may be equally skeptical at the idea we are all one, and the way forward is via a quantum universe, in which the outcome is decided at a personal level of consciousness.

Who am I trying to convince ?? Me or this thread?

I agree with you sktjed... we have to be our own guru. But I am glad for B&K, and Cliff and George and even Dan B because without them, I could not discuss these matters.

K

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

I thought this was all old news. See the whole thread at http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...gh+accusations and my letter to Bill Ryan on his thread.

I don't watch B&K interviews any more. I just can't bring myself to watch. I tried a few times, but.... I can't.

I mentioned above why I am here. I am here because there are real people and that is something that lacking much in the world of the profane.

I like B&K, but I think they are being highly misled and are failing to question much of this information for themselves. It's probably easiest to just see the thread above to understand my position.

--sjkted

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

It seems to me Cliff High is trying to proof that all of the whistleblowers are liars and his so called credible way of doing is to use Taoism (another Religion)???

I wondering if he is getting his pay check from the CIA.
I read his statement about Project Camelot and it seems he turned in to denial and ignorance, as most main stream media people is a little bit stranges.

He thinks this is not possible and yet it is very known that the PTB have technology well more then 1000 years in advance. And our history has proven to be more adanced in the past then the present.

His state of mind is that he is living in a DREAM WORLD...!!!!!!

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

I think a lot of you are dissapointed that Bill got mad at the wrong person.
Some of you think he should have grabbed the bull by the horn and been more challenging to a whistleblower before he got mad at someone who challenged Camelot.
I don't know... I could be wrong.
Actually? I'm glad Bill is'nt a wuss unless he wants to be.(He's not,although He Tee'd me off when I JUST got settled into Camelot and said he was bailing on us and moving underground in australia,and If I qualified finacially,I "might" be able to get a spot on the arK."
Mistakes are made all over..Big Whupp..

Good start.
Me? I'm a big fan...So I'm easy.

Conflicts bring it back to the middle.

I enjoy the middle.
I DID NOT say a good chrisis is good opportunity.
Excuse my spelling..

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

My question is why is Cliff making these statements now ??
Why didn't he say something about Project Camalot before Bill had made his statement about Cliff??
And what makes him the expert??
Just some thoughts I had.

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

They have done a great thing by putting this forum up and inviting people here. Aside from that, it's the members who make this forum.

Their message is based 100% on whistleblowers and the "official reports".

Below is what I wrote to Bill on the Bill Ryan's thread:

Because this really does happen, it is critical to have outside sources that are not based on black ops whistleblowers.

--sjkted

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

"Repent!" - Dr. Deagle

"Float!" - Mr. High

"Dig." - David Rockefeller

"Yakuza." - Ben Fulford

"Shift." - Patrick Geryl

"Nibiru" - Sitchin

"Carbon Dioxide" - Al $ore
http://projectavalon.net/forum/pictu...pictureid=8422

"Nibiru" - Gorilla199

"Nephilim" - Steve Quayle
http://projectavalon.net/forum/pictu...pictureid=8404

"The Sun/Water/Quakes" - High, Deagle, Geryl, Ancient Texts & Mythologies, Jay Weidner, etc.

http://projectavalon.net/forum/pictu...pictureid=8418

.
.
.

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

This is the second time he had made these comments. The first was directed at Bill Deagle's claim of a few underground bases being built every day or so. Cliff was analyzing prices and availability of concrete and was saying that it would be impossible to be building so many underground bases so quickly without affecting the p&a of concrete. In reality, the prices seem to be going down and availability going up.

--sjkted

Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!
 

Majorion: Please see my last post. I'm not saying that anyone is a fraud. I think most if not all of the PC interviews are genuine people who are not lying. The problem is the information they are presenting. If Bill Deagle talks to B&K about seeing documents on underground bases being built at a rate of two per day, etc. I'm not calling Deagle a liar. I'll bet he actually did see that paper or documentation he mentioned. What I'm saying is that that doesn't necessarily mean the information is correct.

Therefore, what I am saying is that the PC witnesses are not frauds or deception themselves, but much of the unverified information they are spreading is simply incorrect.

--sjkted