Originally Posted by Malynda (Post 165110)

Originally Posted by seashore (Post 165118)

Another article has been added.

The title is "Military Project Related To Radio Show?" and it's by By Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. dated today. A quote: "...Learning about the US Army's Project Camelot of the 1960s is essential news. We have no knowledge whatsoever of that Army mind control program being tied in any way to the internet radio program and site of the same name..."

Here's the link:

http://rense.com/general87/milrel.htm

Originally Posted by Karen (Post 165137)

That is pure garbage that this article is not referencing Bill and Kerry's Project Camelot. To see it you have know some history of the attacked and attacker's relationship. If you followed the aftermath of the Zurich conference and the scare that there would be violence over the vaccination question, and what followed ... almost every word is a clue to who wrote this and why. I've posted about that previously in this thread.

If you didn't follow the events, then there is no way to see through this smear piece.

Originally Posted by Lightpotential (Post 165120)

However, what are people to make of his website? The latest posting about "pushing the RAT-1" button?" These postings must practically destroy his credibility in the eyes of people. I do not understand him at all in this respect.

LP

Originally Posted by KathyT (Post 165143)

What is there to understand about a psychopath? Do you really think he had any credibility?

Originally Posted by seashore (Post 165141)

Karen,

I don't think it is the intention of Jeff Rense to smear Bill and Kerry.

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar (Post 165171)

I think that the PTB identified Burisch as a skilled natural con man and recruited him. They then gave him a story to become the character in and he method acted his whole way through it. To this day Dan Burisch probably has no way of knowing which parts of his information where true and which where false. He ran out of story line and was not creative enough to keep making it up.

Originally Posted by Karen (Post 165154)

No I did not mean anything about Rense. I doubt he followed the events, so he can't read the fingerprints all over the piece. I'm talking about who wrote it and I think from all the other signs this is just the beginning steps of a concerted campaign to take down Camelot.

Here's a perfect example of how outsiders to the event cannot be relied upon to give an accurate analysis.

...Several of our members do and for sure Bill Ryan who knows far more of the history of the proceeding events knows who wrote it.

Originally Posted by Seashore (Post 198851)

Is it possible that Rense thought the article in question was actually about the Army's Project Camelot? Thus, it would not be a smear piece at all?

Originally Posted by Seashore (Post 200886)

This quote from "Bill Ryan's thread" on Page 16, Post #389 is regarding this Rense piece:



Can someone tell me who Dr Richard Sauder is?

Originally Posted by Aztar (Post 200919)

Hmm wonder if this is the same guy.

Too 'Conspiratorial' For Strieber! Shunned by Dreamland
By Richard Sauder, Ph.D.


http://www.whale.to/b/too.html

Originally Posted by Seashore (Post 200983)

Thanks...


If it is the same guy, maybe the Rense piece was really about the U.S. Army's Project Camelot, since in this quote he says his book is about U.S. intelligence agencies:

"Why is Kundalini Tales all of a sudden 'too conspiratorial' to talk about?...I broach the topic of highly secretive, covert mind control programs run by United States intelligence agencies..."

Originally Posted by Karen (Post 164860)

There are little clues scattered throughout the thing that it was a hit piece on this Camelot, especially if you watched all the events following the vaccine debate at Zurich. I highlight in red.

Project Camelot And The US Army
By Seasoned Observers of the Scene
8-27-9


Project Camelot was a genuine US Army project in 1964. Wikipedia gives a reasonably accurate, short description:

"Project Camelot was a social science research project of the United States Army in 1964. The goal of the project was to assess the causes of violent social rebellion and to identify the actions a government could take to prevent its own overthrow."
source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Camelot

If you can't hit this one out of the ball park, you had better hang it up.

What if one modus operandi of the MATRIX control structure is to identify sore, social and political pressure points that are concerning growing numbers of people (UFOs, Black Ops, Black Budget, financial corruption, alternative energy, government cover-ups, the secret space program, etc.), and then establish Project Camelot-style operations (the U.S. military's term) in the 'alternative media' to try to relieve that pressure by trotting out an endless succession of fake or tired "whistle blowers" - many of whom (most?) somehow will never manage to concretely, objectively, CONCLUSIVELY prove ANYTHING of much consequence, while simultaneously blowing a lot of hot air, ego, and disinformation smoke all over the place, thereby vicariously occupying the minds and time of large numbers of otherwise potentially politically active people with endless mystification, petty dramas, spectacular and inevitably unverifiable allegations, shadowy personages of uncertain identity, and so on, ad nauseam.

Among the key giveaways of such operations and operators is their 'overnight' sudden appearance and full-blown 'presence'. First, the slick, well-funded website appears followed by the inevitable internet radio 'truth' program...of which there are countless hundreds now. Sometimes 'conferences' and seminars are organized usually staffed with the same old familiar information (and disinformation) merchants.

There are different tactics for quickly establishing a 'name' in such operations. The easiest technique is to spew out a string of relatively solid and sometimes new information to draw interest, establish some 'buzz' and credibility. Another method is to attack some of the established names in the alternative field, accusing them of being 'agents provocateurs', and baiting them into defending themselves, thereby wasting their time and energy. Yet another way is to accumulate a string of 'names' as writers and radio guests to add to the appearance of credibility. And there are other tactics, but ultimately, these operations give themselves away by gradually shifting away from covering provable fact and misdirecting people to nebulous areas of speculation, fantastic wild claims, and unfounded, fictional topics.

For those who still don't get it:

Tea kettles don't explode because they have a whistle on them that blows off steam when the temperature of the water rises. Got it? So the alphabet soup agencies put "social control valves" of various kinds on the societal tea kettle (think of the U.S. Army's 1964 'Project Camelot' study) so that when society begins to get upset at the rampant, malignant corruption in government, the societal tea kettle simply blows off steam through the "whistle" thingy instead of exploding in social unrest and a popular uprising.

So, the "whistle blower" gambit may deflect people's attention from more serious matters by rendering people into passive observers of dramas that others stage for them to observe, as opposed to concretely, personally organizing their own direct social activity in policy areas that concern them. That is what, of course, the alphabet soup agencies absolutely do not want, because then people are no longer their passive, unquestioningly obedient, ignorant, compliant, dumbed-down, 1040 revenue-producing slave units.

Think creatively, and act courageously and nonviolently (because violence just feeds the MATRIX social control monster, see?). Enough fake, pretend "whistle blowing" by transparent, wannabe poseurs. Aren't there any real American adults anymore?

Originally Posted by Karen (Post 165154)

No I did not mean anything about Rense. I doubt he followed the events, so he can't read the fingerprints all over the piece. I'm talking about who wrote it and I think from all the other signs this is just the beginning steps of a concerted campaign to take down Camelot.

Here's a perfect example of how outsiders to the event cannot be relied upon to give an accurate analysis.

...Several of our members do and for sure Bill Ryan who knows far more of the history of the proceeding events knows who wrote it.