Re: ALL is Spiritual
 

Hi beloved..

Does all is spiritual say anything else than there is no duality in quality ?

:shocked:

love..

Re: ALL is Spiritual
 

mudra, that is DEEP- SPIRIT gets board and falls to remind itself of self!
Really makes you appreciate being! Lets lose ourselves go completely astray and then find ourselves again! Moody Blues (circa 1986). And correct no guarantees in 3 Ds. Follow the thread indeed. BACK!


Kundaflower, Love back at ya! A state of all knowing is pure bliss and is indescri-bable. A state of knowing what and when needed or you want to know, is spirit, spirit judges all things rightly. So if you walk in the spirit you know! Mind of Christ is one way to look at it.

Is being in illusion, good bad or what? Depends if you are an observer or attached, but sure is interesting!

Is there anything we have to do? Not really - Will and keep breathing and observe! And if U get hungry maybe eat a banana!

YOU ASKED,my humble opinion or was that onion!

PEACE OM PEACE

Re: ALL is Spiritual
 

Quote:

If everything is spiritual then this is not a separate forum...

Yes, this is exactly the point!

However, it's the "illusion" that there is separation (via a person’s limited perception) which should be considered when discussing this topic. :original:

Quote:

All is All not Spirituality.

This is also a good point and probably a more complete (hence accurate) way of wording it.

So yes it could be stated that ALL is MORE than Spiritual.

Spirit was just the wording I chose for the most fundamental and all-inclusive consideration for existence (and beyond) while retaining a divine attribute and connection to us the sentient, etc, observors. Whereas sometimes when you say the word "ALL" people don't get a sense of a personal, divine or mystical attribute, but more of a sterile materialistic slant.

If this makes any sense? :hypo:

http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p...re_by_kelc.jpg

Re: ALL is Spiritual
 

i got ya NOWIAM... much of what you said is implied... and if we want to get into semantics all is not all... all simply is, and even giving it "all" name takes away from it